Which game would you prefer.?

**IceTorque** · 05-31-2005, 15:39

without a doubt i would be playing the 20,000 man per army game.
Because when i'm in the heat of battle in RTW and " zoomed out "
the you beaut graphics don't look so good anyways.

**Shambles** · 05-31-2005, 15:52

More men charging towards me = more fear,

more fear = better exitement

The better exitement = better game,

IMO

STW 20,000

One of the reasons i hate rome is the pitifull amount of men.

when u see 120 no dachi charging at you in STW,
You thought OMG I better do something.

Then you saw 120 Yari cav coming at you from the other flank,

And its time to Panic,

Yell OMG And tell your yari samurai ,
"RUN Over there" Protect me!!!

and send your own 120 no dachi to attack the 120 no dachi that are charging you,

Just to cool,

In rome, its

Oh here comes a few units of horse men,
never mind theres not many of them any way,
"YAWN"

**Mikeus Caesar** · 05-31-2005, 16:34

I have to agree, compared to RTW, the battles in MTW and STW were absolutely massive. I remember my first battle as the english, invading scotland, and i thought wow, this is big, even though it was only 500 v 600. And then my next battle against the Germans, i thought WOW!! because the battle was huge. It was 5000 v 5000, and it was amazing. And now, i look at RTW, and i think, hm, yes, a battle. Only 500 v 500...

**Mongoose** · 05-31-2005, 16:38

The more the better i guess...

Were the MTW battles really bigger then RTW?

**Productivity** · 05-31-2005, 16:52

I don't think there is too much in terms of graphics difference between MTW and STW. It looks like it's running the same engine, so I don't see that there is a huge difference there.

On the other hand it's been a long time since I've played STW.

**IliaDN** · 05-31-2005, 17:06

I voted MTW , but I didn't play STW and if you say grphics is all the same than cnsider me voted for STW

**tibilicus** · 05-31-2005, 17:25

RTW. Detail is everything

**Shambles** · 05-31-2005, 19:45

Originally Posted by mongoose

The more the better i guess...

Were the MTW battles really bigger then RTW?

STW has some HUGE battles
Now MTW isnt far off the same amount of people,
But RTW Pales in comparison.

I voted MTW , but I didn't play STW and if you say grphics is all the same than cnsider me voted for STW

How to best explain???
AH Yes Time for my patend pending SUper duper wide angle lense Panaramic Screen shot's,

From a seemingly quiet day out with your troops

Battles get intence

But the loss of life is severe for all

----------------
STAND YOUR GROUND YOU MISERABLE BUNCH!

--------------
Its hard to fit all the units in to 1 picture,
But this is my army, Just mine no allys or enemys,
The oposition had the same amount of units as well.
But there off screen

You cant see ALL my units there either But close enough
===============

Rtw may have snazzy gfx But They lost A lot of feeling from the battles,
I say STW is still the best for the feel of a battle

STW

Want more of these pics?
http://shoguntw.2ya.com/sdump/
I use them as desk top back grounds
ShambleS

**Tocca** · 05-31-2005, 20:27

RTW is much more CPU intensive, but if you've got a fast PC it's possible to have just as big battles in RTW as on thoose screens.
I've had custom battles with over 6000 men in RTW, i can't run with all graphics at max then but it looks much much better than MTW or STW even with the graphics turned down so it runs good.