Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: The most meaningless conflict

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default The most meaningless conflict

    OK, so I just finished reading the excellent The Thirty Years War by C.V.Wedgewood.

    Even before I got to the concluding chapter it was pretty obvious to me that this was a war of pointlessly unceasing suffering for the masses, a war that was started and continued almost entirely through the vanity, selfishness, pride and ambition of just a handful of men.

    "The war solved no problems. Its effects, both immediate and indirect, were either negative or disastrous. Morally subversive, economically destructive, socially degrading, confused in its causes, devious in its course, futile in its result, it is the outstanding example in European history of meaningless conflict."

    Couldn't have said it better myself luv
    "I request permanent reassignment to the Gallic frontier. Nay, I demand reassignment. Perhaps it is improper to say so, but I refuse to fight against the Greeks or Macedonians any more. Give my command to another, for I cannot, I will not, lead an army into battle against a civilized nation so long as the Gauls survive. I am not the young man I once was, but I swear before Jupiter Optimus Maximus that I shall see a world without Gauls before I take my final breath."

    Senator Augustus Verginius

  2. #2

    Default Re: The most meaningless conflict

    The war of 1812 is another good example of a meaningless conflict. It was basically a grudge match between the British and the recently revolted British.

    There was no way Britain was going to take back the colonies and there was no way America could control the impressment and other naval harrassment that the British did to them, as the conflict and its aftermath demonstrated.

  3. #3
    The Orgs Prophet of RATM Member IrishMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in the defensive area of a soccer field, slaughtering puny strikers.
    Posts
    903

    Default Re: The most meaningless conflict

    The Allied Force sent into Russia to support the fight against Communist overthrow was pretty meaningless. Infact its so meaningless most people don't even know about it. They took a few port cities and that was it, then eventually left. Nothing was gained, nothing was stopped.
    When ignorance reigns life is lost.

    War is norm, Fight the War, Screw the norm!

  4. #4
    Ambiguous Member Byzantine Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Default Re: The most meaningless conflict

    World War 1. A pointless disaster like no other. Basically a bunch of royals sending everyone to their deaths because of stupid alliances with eachother. Germany invading France JUST because they were allied to the Russians. Austrians attacking Serbia just because of some monkey that did something stupid. Russia attacking Prussia and Austria-Hungary because Serbians were their allies and so on. Deep down I know these people wanted to attack eachother anyways, and were just waiting for excuse, but what they did is unforgivable.

  5. #5
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Re: The most meaningless conflict

    Quote Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
    World War 1. A pointless disaster like no other. Basically a bunch of royals sending everyone to their deaths because of stupid alliances with eachother. Germany invading France JUST because they were allied to the Russians. Austrians attacking Serbia just because of some monkey that did something stupid. Russia attacking Prussia and Austria-Hungary because Serbians were their allies and so on. Deep down I know these people wanted to attack eachother anyways, and were just waiting for excuse, but what they did is unforgivable.

    Actually, Germany invaded France just because they wanted to. The war between France and Germany would have happened anyway, since the Germans wanted to bash the French so they couldn't be a threat anymore, and since the French wanted to take back the lands they lost in 1870.

    In french schools, young boys were taught that they would have to defend their patry someday, and that Alsace-Lorraine was to be owned by France, and not by Germany.

    But yeah, the war fought by the europeans against the soviets in 1918 was pretty meaningless. Russia was then ruled by a lot of different factions (Europeans, White Russians, Communists, Royalists, Chineses, Japanases. I heard that a german whose father was member of the Teutonic Order even tried to hire an army of mongols, chineses and russians to invade russia, as he though he was the descendant of Genghis Khan)
    Last edited by Meneldil; 06-02-2005 at 20:57.

  6. #6
    dictator by the people Member caesar44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the holy(?) land
    Posts
    1,207

    Smile Re: The most meaningless conflict

    the question is - meaningless to whom ? to the winner ? to the looser ?
    to the attacker ? to the defender ? to the world ?
    "The essence of philosophy is to ask the eternal question that has no answer" (Aristotel) . "Yes !!!" (me) .

    "Its time we stop worrying, and get angry you know? But not angry and pick up a gun, but angry and open our minds." (Tupac Amaru Shakur)

  7. #7
    Humanist Senior Member Franconicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trying to get to Utopia
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: Re : Re: The most meaningless conflict

    Quote Originally Posted by Meneldil
    Actually, Germany invaded France just because they wanted to. The war between France and Germany would have happened anyway, since the Germans wanted to bash the French so they couldn't be a threat anymore, and since the French wanted to take back the lands they lost in 1870.
    I do not agree. Germany excpected the French to attack and did not want to come between Russia and France. And there were some people in France who wanted war with Germany.

  8. #8
    Member Member cunctator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Civitas Auderiensium, Germania Superior
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: The most meaningless conflict

    Not as desatrous as the 30year war but still meaningless. The 1969 soccer war between Honduras and El Salvador. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soccer_War

  9. #9
    Tovenaar Senior Member The Wizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,348

    Default Re: The most meaningless conflict

    Quote Originally Posted by cunctator
    Not as desatrous as the 30year war but still meaningless. The 1969 soccer war between Honduras and El Salvador. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soccer_War
    Yes, I lived there from '98 to 2000 and I must say it's a deep-running memory.

    BP, the Great War was fought out just as much over power, chauvinism and hatred between nations just as much as it was fought out over who had alliances with who. It was a conflict which had been waiting to happen ever since the 1870s.

    Another nice and pointless war was the civil war at the death of Andronicus III in the Byzantine Empire, from 1341 to 1347. It was obvious John Cantacuzenus did not want to claim the throne for himself, but political and personal enemies plotted and intrigued against him so that he was forced to take the throne to protect his position and the Empire itself. Empress Anne, one of the great bitches of history as I like to say, pawned the imperial crown jewels to the Venetians for a loan (a loan, goddammit!) of 30000 ducats! To top it all off, it never arrived! And all that while the Byzantines' enemies were closing in around them, most notably amongst them Stefan Dushan, King of Serbia, who expanded his empire while playing the different Byzantine factions off against each other.

    The war greatly weakened the position of the empire, which had been strengthened under Andronicus III, lost the Byzantines their crown jewels, and set the stage for the Ottoman invasion of the 1360s and onwards. Nothing was achieved, for John V Palaeologus remained co-Emperor and John VI Cantacuzenus his regent en effet.



    ~Wiz
    Last edited by The Wizard; 06-02-2005 at 20:39.
    "It ain't where you're from / it's where you're at."

    Eric B. & Rakim, I Know You Got Soul

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO