i came across the Minimal-greek-mod today. i saw some nice, but weird, units.
The mod agrued that hypaspistai werent phalangites or hoplites. due to their versatily role threw history the might very well have changed since Alexander (the time in wich they were prett 'clearly' hoplites or phalangites) so they used Hypaspistai asskirmishes-infantry and shock-inf. having 4 javs and a short sword and a big hoplon. there even was a Corinthian hypaspistai. wich was comparable with the spartan hoplite (in guality)
they talked abotu greeks using thessalian-cavalry. why i dont doubt they sometimes used it. but i was under teh impression the 'allied hellenes' never used a cavalry arm.
and last but not least:Krypteia....
these where young men recruited by the temple of Nike (.....) and where a step up from Thureophoroi. they were in smaller number and masters in stealth and ambushing.
whats EB's take on these units? will soem be featured? or are they crap and not true?
doubting the last part...
the site also states that alexandersd Hypaspistai slowly became known as SIlver shields (argyraspidai). so is this not true, or is EB using two units for what was one?(doubt EB is wrong..)
another thing, direct quote:
They were 10,000 strong and fought as the right flank of the phalanx for example at Raphia under Antiochus III. This is the unit that was re-equipped as Roman legionaries under Antiochus IV (as represented in RTW - good research, CA).
Bookmarks