Tech trees

[ScionTheWorm]

agree, but it don't seem like it's going to be a problem with 500 max... but when we get the unitlist finished we have to get some system of the models; which shall use the same model etc

[Ranika]

That's what I meant; plan for model space. Planning to fit things into models after the fact is much harder than planning after the models are all done.

[Incongruous]

Napsugár-This is the sun, one of the Magyar "gods", this god meant wether you'd have a good harves or a bad one.

Hónap-This is the moon. Theis was the god of the hunt, Although Magyars relied more and more on Agriculture, this god still captured their imagination.


Egek-Celestial spehere or sky.

Csillagzat- THis is star, the Magyar beleved that the starts were holes in the sky and allowed one to see the graet spirits.

[Rodion Romanovich]

Napsugár-This is the sun, one of the Magyar "gods", this god meant wether you'd have a good harves or a bad one.

Hónap-This is the moon. Theis was the god of the hunt, Although Magyars relied more and more on Agriculture, this god still captured their imagination.


Egek-Celestial spehere or sky.

Csillagzat- THis is star, the Magyar beleved that the starts were holes in the sky and allowed one to see the graet spirits.

Ok, then the shrine boni could be:
- Napsugár - +agriculture and +population growth and +happiness
- Hónap - +missile attack and +happiness
- Egek - ? and +happiness
- Csillagzat- ? and +happiness

Better ideas needed where I put the question marks. One of those could be the type of shrine with happiness only but instead more happiness than the others. Then we need to decide which of them will get two happiness boni and which one will get some other bonus, and what bonus that will be.

[GoreBag]

Just a question...

Is it possible to add the "academy" series of effects to other buildings? If so, perhaps largely upgraded temple buildings should have them.

[Rodion Romanovich]

@NeonGod: Yeah, that's a good idea. I haven't looked into it but it might be possible. Would add an interesting touch.

[Incongruous]

I just had to post this little fact, sorry if its tye wrong thread.
Did you know that Anglo-Saxon/Englisc swords were better than thos of the Samurai, no shit. They could cleave a man in two with one stroke. So you might want to give the more expensive swordsmen really awsome attack.

[Jarlabanke]

What exactly do you mean by "better"? As I've understood it the general consensus is that most swords were pretty much ideal for their specific purpouse, of course taking in to account the methods and material available to the smiths. So saying that this or that sword is outright better than the other just simply doesn't make sense.
As for cleaving a man, do you mean head to toe
or just right across the waist?
No doubt though the swords of this period was indeed very good workmanship as many smiths used so called pattern welding, a system similar to that used by the Japanese, which was later abandoned as getting the right type of steel was made easier by new inventions.
Further more the same type of swords were used pretty much all over northen europe, France and the british isles with the french being generally regarded as the best smiths.
Swords were however not really as unusual as people often make them out to be, with several thousands of finds in Scandinavia alone, and that taking into account that that we've thousands of unexcavated graves (though admittedly most probably belonging to farmers) and that the most common burial practice before the arival of christendom was inhumation.
I'd say one should be careful to give the sword to much damage in relation to other weapons especially the two handed dane axe, swordstroops should probably just have faster attack or better defence values than higher damage. Or if given higher damage, should lack the same anti armour capabilities as axes.