Results 1 to 30 of 296

Thread: Campaign map

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Campaign map

    Yes, Euratlas maps are trully great. There are one of my sources for the map I made earlier :)

    Vikings factions should not waste a lot of time conquering Scandinavia. I think the north of Scandinavia and Finland should not have a lot of Provinces, and be heavily protected by rebel armies, just as eastern russia (so the Varagians and the Khazars don't spend their time conquering empty lands once they've torn apart the Volga Bulghars and the few other organized tribes living here)

  2. #2
    Arbeit macht fleisch Member ScionTheWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norwegen
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Re : Campaign map

    Quote Originally Posted by Meneldil
    Yes, Euratlas maps are trully great. There are one of my sources for the map I made earlier :)

    Vikings factions should not waste a lot of time conquering Scandinavia. I think the north of Scandinavia and Finland should not have a lot of Provinces, and be heavily protected by rebel armies, just as eastern russia (so the Varagians and the Khazars don't spend their time conquering empty lands once they've torn apart the Volga Bulghars and the few other organized tribes living here)
    the player will probably be able to do conquer the way vikings did at this time in spite of a detailed north. even though northern british isles and scandinavia is presented, the player can leave them alone and do whatever he want - ravish his way down to sahara without care if he wants. the ai is another story, but giving them an agressive nature and setting up some badass starting dimplomacy may make them kick a lot of ass.

    edit:
    btw my opinion on greenland is waste of time and space.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Campaign map

    Should they necessarily kick more ass than the other factions, though? Not everyone can dig the Northmen.

  4. #4
    Arbeit macht fleisch Member ScionTheWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norwegen
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Campaign map

    if not kick ass then at least pain in the ass

  5. #5

    Default Re: Campaign map

    Like I said, though; more than other factions? I'm sure they'll be a tough opponent and will have some sweet units, but none of the factions will be pushovers.

    (Have you been drinking?)

  6. #6
    Arbeit macht fleisch Member ScionTheWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norwegen
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Campaign map

    Quote Originally Posted by NeonGod
    Like I said, though; more than other factions? I'm sure they'll be a tough opponent and will have some sweet units, but none of the factions will be pushovers.
    nah no pushovers. I just feel they should be agressive so we don't have defensive and scared vikings. actually it's not that important to me, so I'll give the torch to someone more competent on history. I'm just defending number of provinces.

    Quote Originally Posted by NeonGod
    (Have you been drinking?)
    haha! no... just lost my pills down in the sink, that's all

  7. #7

    Default Re: Campaign map

    I think that more provinces are good. I hate big ones..

    If I could synthesize a Kool-Aid Man saying "Oh no" for you, I would.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO