Results 1 to 30 of 296

Thread: Campaign map

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Arbeit macht fleisch Member ScionTheWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norwegen
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Campaign map

    if not kick ass then at least pain in the ass

  2. #2

    Default Re: Campaign map

    Like I said, though; more than other factions? I'm sure they'll be a tough opponent and will have some sweet units, but none of the factions will be pushovers.

    (Have you been drinking?)

  3. #3
    Arbeit macht fleisch Member ScionTheWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norwegen
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: Campaign map

    Quote Originally Posted by NeonGod
    Like I said, though; more than other factions? I'm sure they'll be a tough opponent and will have some sweet units, but none of the factions will be pushovers.
    nah no pushovers. I just feel they should be agressive so we don't have defensive and scared vikings. actually it's not that important to me, so I'll give the torch to someone more competent on history. I'm just defending number of provinces.

    Quote Originally Posted by NeonGod
    (Have you been drinking?)
    haha! no... just lost my pills down in the sink, that's all

  4. #4

    Default Re: Campaign map

    I think that more provinces are good. I hate big ones..

    If I could synthesize a Kool-Aid Man saying "Oh no" for you, I would.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Campaign map

    LOL

    Imo (and i have been drinking :p) the vikings should start with some really misplaced armys to be the pain in the ass they were. Not huge conqering armys, but small bands of them in England, Portugal, Italy and france. This ofcource needs alot of playtesting, but it wold probably be alot of fun.

    They wold never in any case be able to hold on any provinces in the south, but as a player you wold be able to loot southeuropean citys (realistic) and if you play one of the other factions you should start with armys facing the obvious borders, and be forced to deal with them in yous unprotected "backdoor (realistic).

    The byzantine/muslim/khazar armys were huge organized dreadnoughts, batteling out huge battles compared to the northern kingdoms. And they should, by setting economy/sterting armys/diplomacy/technology/personality be forced to focus on huge battles among eachother, and then being vulnerable for smaller attacks away from their fronts. (if possibele)

    This is just my oppinion, but for all offencive factoins of the time, having armys spread way past their borders wold make the campaigns very interesting.

    Ofcource, small raidingpartys shouldnt stand a chance against any of the factions main armys. But having vikings all over Europe (specially in britain) and muslims penetrating in Byzantine areas, Franks penetrating Al-Andalus areas, aso. wold be very realistic.

    -Skel-

    Age of vikings and fanatics: Total War

  6. #6

    Default Re: Campaign map

    The problem with that is that these raiding parties weren't under the same kind of central leadership that will be present once the player takes over. If these small viking armies were to be Rebels, though, I think that it would make a nice touch.

  7. #7
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Re: Campaign map

    Quote Originally Posted by skeletor
    LOL

    Imo (and i have been drinking :p) the vikings should start with some really misplaced armys to be the pain in the ass they were. Not huge conqering armys, but small bands of them in England, Portugal, Italy and france. This ofcource needs alot of playtesting, but it wold probably be alot of fun.

    (...)

    Ofcource, small raidingpartys shouldnt stand a chance against any of the factions main armys. But having vikings all over Europe (specially in britain) and muslims penetrating in Byzantine areas, Franks penetrating Al-Andalus areas, aso. wold be very realistic.

    -Skel-

    Well, as far as I know, a raiding army far away from its faction's lands will just try to go retreat to its cities, and won't raid anything. If you want these raiding armies to attack britain/france/whatever, you'll have to give them a settlement in these regions (which isn't un-historical), or to use command scripts such as "attack 'xxxxx' settlement".

    Edit : Or as Neon God said, make these armies rebels, and everything will be fine I think :)

  8. #8
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Campaign map


    1 - Aquitaine - Limoges
    2 - Gascogne - Bordeaux
    3 - Brittany - Rennes
    4 - Neustria/Maine/Anjou - Orléans (could be replaced by Le Mans or Angers)
    5 - Septimania - Montpellier (could be replaced by Narbonnes)
    6 - Provence - Marseilles
    7 - Burgundy - Besancon
    8 - France - Paris
    9 - Flanders - Boulogne
    10 - Upper Normandy - Rouen
    11 - Lower Normandy - Avranches
    12 - Spanish March - Barcelona
    13 - Navarre - Pamplona
    14 - Castilla - Burgos
    15 - Leon - Oviedo (could be remplaced by Leon -the city)
    16 - Gallicia - Oporto (could be replaced by Santiago de Compostela)
    17 - Toulouse - Toulouse
    18 - Badajoz - Badajoz
    19 - Toledo - Toledo
    20 - Zaragoza - Zaragoza
    21 - Valencia - Valencia (I don't know if this place was an independant Emirate or part of Cordoba during the 9th century)
    22 - Almeria - Almeria
    23 - Granada - Granada
    24 - Cordova - Cordova
    25 - Sevilla - Sevilla
    26 - Novgorod - Novgorod
    27 - Polotsk - Polotsk
    28 - Smolensk - Smolensk
    29 - Rostov-Suzdal - Rostov (could be replaced be either Vladimir or Suzdal)
    30 - Kiev - Kiev
    31 - Pereiaslav - Pereiaslav
    32 - Chernihiv - Ryazan
    33 - Volhynia - Brest
    34 - Galich - Galich
    35 - Estonia ? - ???
    36 - Livonia ? - ???
    37 - Lithuania - ???
    38 - Prussia - ???
    39 - Pomerania - Kolberg
    40 - Mazovia - Plock
    41 - Chrobatia - Cracow
    42 - Polania - Posen
    43 - Friesland - Utrecht
    44 - Ripuaria (could be Upper Lorraine/Lotharingia) - Aix la Chapelle
    45 - Moselle (could be Lower Lorraine/Lotharingia) - Strasburg
    46 - Liguria - Genoa
    47 - Tuscany - Florence (Pisa ?)
    48 - States of the Church - Roma
    49 - Spoleto - Spoleto
    50 - Venetia - Venice
    51 - Friuli - Aquileia
    52 - Croatia - Sissek
    53 - Servia - ???
    54 - Lombardy - Milan
    55 - Alemannia - Zurich
    56 - Franconia - Frankfort
    57 - Saxonnia - Bremen
    58 - Transalbingia - Hamburg
    59 - March of the Billungs - Oldenburg
    60 - NordMark - Brandenburg
    61 - OstMark - Juterbog
    62 - Bohemia - Prague
    63 - Bavaria - Salzburg
    64 - Moravia - Olmutz
    65 - Silesia - Breslau
    66 - Carinthia - Fiesach
    67 - Cherson - Cherson
    68 - Tmoutarakan - Tmoutarakan
    69 - Levédia - ??? (land of the Magyars in 840/850)
    70 - Etelköz - ??? (land of the Magyars in 840/850)
    71 - Pannonia - Ofen
    72 - Avarorum Solitudo - Kaliesa (sp?)
    73 - Carpathia - Erlau
    74 - Transylvania - ???
    75 - Banat - Vidin
    76 - Dalmatia - Ragusa
    77 - Dyrrachium - Dyrrachium
    78 - Nicopolis - Nicopolis
    79 - Peloponnesus - Corinthes
    80 - Hellas - Athens
    81 - Thessalonica - Salonica
    82 - Macedonia - Andrianople
    83 - Thrace - Constantinople
    Last edited by Meneldil; 08-01-2005 at 12:11.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO