Quote Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
Should Intellegent Design, Creationism, and other scientific theories explaining the birth of the world be taught alongside evolution as other theories, or should evolution remain the unchallenged theory that, although it is only a theory, is taught as a fact nationwide?
Intelligent Design and Creationism are not science. Whatever appeal one might feel for them, these ideas do not fit under scientific schema.

Stating Evolution is only a theory suggests this is somehow a bad thing or insufficient. This is a mistake. Theories do not become facts. Facts exist within theories. Theories provide the intellectual context through which facts become meaningful.

Challenging Evolution or pointing out its limits is perfectly appropriate. This does not mean extra-scientific models therefore are appropriate in a science setting.