I am not sure Andrew Marwell would agree.Originally Posted by Pindar
![]()
Even if there is an appeal on higher powers, it doesn't go beyond science. Religion, language, psychology etc are accepted as science today even if its not always possible to put logic or empirical values on results from research in these sciences. Creationism is always assumed to contradict evalutionism, but in reality this is more a created conflict mainly in US among scientists and religious scholars. Evolution doesn't oppose creationism and vice versa. Another example would be Newtons law versus Einsteins relativity theory. Newton works just fine until you reach higher velocities where it's no longer is valid.
All science evolve itself and its always better to be tolerant and open minded. Creationists have a tendency to be very narrowminded, but that doesn't make creationism as such scientifically un-interesting.......![]()
Note: No, I don't believe in a supreme being, but can't dispute the possibility that there is one...
Bookmarks