Never had that incident before
Never had that incident before
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If I was smart, I would have a witty punchline in this sig that would make everyone ROTFL.
I'm not smart.
It is just as ChaosLord and Uriel state. It's an annoying bug as i like to keep tabs on how my family have done throughout my campaign, thus i very rarely enter battles with more than one General, or if i do i keep the spare generals out of harms way until the enemy routs.
'died peacefully' - on a battlefield with a sword cleaved through my skull - not my idea of peaceful, but i'm not a masochist![]()
May i ask why you even need five generals in a stack? I only have one general to a stack, as it frees up the spare ones for governing, apart from the time when i had 11 extra generals, and the Seleucids had one town left that happened to be on my border...that was a fun battle that. I had an army made up of mercs and generals....but that story is for another time![]()
Maybe he was moving them from town to town? I do that on occasion, take three or four generals from one town via ship to another area with some extra units, and have them meet up with separate armies I've been piecing together over there so I can have a few full-fledged armies. Of course, when I do that I usually do it in order to lay siege to several enemy towns at the same time, so that I can wipe them out completely in one turn.
Who had five generals in a stack?Originally Posted by Mikeus Caesar
Actually, beginning campaign games are quite profitable if you use your generals in groups of 4 or 5, just because their troops "regenerate."
Bookmarks