Except in the RTW era they wouldn't be ransomed but sold into slavery, to be worked to death. Or killed out right.Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
Except in the RTW era they wouldn't be ransomed but sold into slavery, to be worked to death. Or killed out right.Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.
VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI
I came, I saw, I kicked ass
True. Roman's didn't care about getting any ransom would rather have free labor.Originally Posted by lars573
It would be nice if you had the option to either capture or kill the fleeing army. Afterwards give the option to either sell the captured men or kill them. Another idea, give the captured an option to either join your army, or be sold into slavery. They could be like mercs where you can't retrain them, and the chance they revolt would be there also.
"What did the five fingers say to the face?"
Well Hannibal tried to ransom 10,000 Romans but the senate refused the offer and any family members trying to ransom back therefamily member would be persecuted.Originally Posted by lars573
Ransom always did exist just not commonly exercised until around the 10th to 13th century or so.
When a fox kills your chickens, do you kill the pigs for seeing what happened? No you go out and hunt the fox.
Cry havoc and let slip the HOGS of war
Yeah between larger gov'ts you would find ransoming in effect (like the stated example) but the Middle Ages was the time period when the most records depict ransoming becoming widespread. Kings, Nobles and Barons have a lot of gold; and people knew that and would try to get all they could out of them before returning them. Ordinary soldiers would probably only have been considered "Ransomable" if their leadership was respected enough.Originally Posted by oaty
robotica erotica
Send in the dogs!
Its not flooding if you have something good to say.
Bookmarks