A mother has no right to kill her child after its born, why should they have the right to kill their child before its born - especially since we now know so many children can live long before natural birth.
Well, in all countries that aren't trapped in a fanatical battle between two extremes , the abortion period is limited to the period before a festus can survive in any way outside the mothers womb.

But to put it in a different frame, do we really want to go down in the history books as a group of people who allowed the killing of millions of innocent children each year, but spent millions of dollars trying to rehabilitate criminals? Something is backwards there.
Considering the development of genetical and mental research, I'm going to guess that in the first case they won't care much and in the second case they are probably going to think that it was on the right track, but much less effective than with thier own methods. A bright future? Perhaps..., but certainly different.