Yes, there were tons of quotes in the Jerusalem Post claiming Sharon was complicit with the slaughter in those camps up in Lebanon,
Don , the original inquiry found that he was complicit through negligence , incompetance, inaction and failure in duty . But not complicit in the actual slaughter . The person who was assassinated claimed to have evidence that he was complicit in the actual massacre , but as he was killed before he testified and the evidence he claimed was in safe hands just in case such an event occured has never surfaced .
Though of course unless he did have real evidence to back up his claims I don't think his testimony would have stood up to much as he could hardly be described as a reliable witness .
It may be true , but it may be not , which is why I wrote "unproven" not "unfounded" .
Bookmarks