The illustrations are hardly imaginary in most cases - they are based on historical sources, stories and findings, including artworks from the age and armour. For example, pieces like the Bayeux Tapestry, which show Norman Cavalryman throwing javelins, inspire depictions of Hastings to feature that also. Why would respected historians and artists make stuff up? There's no point in that. You are completely dismissing the amount of research that must go into these paintings. Short of having a time machine, of course they aren't 100% accurate recreations of battles! What did you expect BP? They may not be completely authentic, but we, including you, will never know, and this is the best we're ever going to get for allowing us to see how battles in the past played out, how warriors lived, fought and looked and exactly what part castles and siege equipment played in proceedings.
Furthermore, what did these men look like then BP? You got any better suggestions? What do you think modders like the EB team used? I know I certainly could not have made my mod without the visual guides that are these books. They may not be as academic as some would like, but these books allow us an insight into many different areas, enabling us to learn about and more importantly SEE what went on in the past. I think there is a certain snobbery geared at Osprey books due to their smallish size and illustrative format, but IMO this is pure ignorance.
EdyzMedieval, don't panic. Stick to a subject you like, or wish to learn more about, and good artists, like those I mentioned (especially McBride), and you'll be fine. Have a look through the Osprey thread to see the kind of artwork you can expect, and check out their site here:
Osprey
Some of the more recent works feature sample plates and extracts so you can get a feel for them before you decide to buy.
Bookmarks