Look out Kofi...

I'm trying really hard to understand here. But other than "He'll really stick it to the guys at the UN, cause he's a real ballbreaker", honestly, what is the argument for John Bolton? Does he really and truly have some example from his personnel file, other than complaints filed, that indicate he might actually be able to implement America's desired policy objectives at the UN? I'm not quite sure what to think of this guy, but every time this comes up, the only support I hear from him is "well, he's a real browbeater, he'll teach the UN a thing or two". While this is most likely true, is that alone qualification to be our representative at the UN? Or am I missing something?