Re: winning without honor?
I've been trying to kill off Turkish generals with assassins.
They have just 3 armies. In their only remaining provence.
The King comands the army in their Fort.
His two sons command the other two armies. (one is 2star, the other 5star).
Every time I my assassins kill the the 2star prince, he is replaced by another 2star prince.
Re: winning without honor?
The Sultan may have more than one 2-star Prince stacked on top of each other - send an Emissary or Princess to that province to get a detailed look at what you're facing. Otherwise, just keep assassinating away - sooner or later you'll get to the bottom of that bunch!
My father's sole piece of political advice: "Son, politicians are like underwear - to keep them clean, you've got to change them often."
Re: winning without honor?
I having the assassin in the area gives me the ability to see the makeup of the army, before assassinating the 2star prince it said that all other unit's leaders had no stars or royal blood.
Is it feasible that the unit is made of all royal blood? is this a tukish thing maybe?
Re: winning without honor?
I like killing the Royal Family members on the battlefield...
I like very much the Virtue: Man of Honour... It describes me
Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.
Proud
Been to:
Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.
A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?
Re: winning without honor?
Let assassins sit in border provinces and port provinces. They'll get XP from catching spies. I don't think it's documented.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks