Mods lying/deleting threads for no reason

HorseArcher2 · 06-24-2005, 04:55

Just like you did before (by not reading) you're missing the point.

One usage of the word "shit" (heard in every aspect of society, television, bars/pubs, books daily) is not enough to be banned for 2 days.

Please stop replying before understanding the whole situation...re-read my original post.

my god...

**IrishMike** · 06-24-2005, 04:57

My first post was incorrect true, you got me on that, but I now totally understand what is going on.

HorseArcher2 · 06-24-2005, 04:58

you need FIVE (can you read? FIVE (5) warning points to be banned, I've read my own warning point sheet and it only amounts to 4...

2 of which have absolutely no reference to anything...they were just tallied on by a mod...

1 was given for using the word "retarded"

0 were given for the post that you claim is "more than enough to be banned on"

again...please re-read my first post on this thread, and stop replying without a clue, so you don't need to apologize for a second time.

Thank You (the main point of this thread is for a mod to respond, not another forum poster as they obviously cannot answer the question as to why a mod did what I'm accusing them of doing)

HorseArcher2 · 06-24-2005, 05:05

hey simetrical...thank you for the fairness.

and check your personal messages, I sent you one regarding a 6 month ban or whatever...

I will add that just as in here, I've been openly and freely posting on twcenter.net since you "banned" me as well...many people circumvent those bans as well...they're useless.

Not only that, but you've actually applauded many of my threads since you've "banned" me and agreed on many of my posts...

should tell you something shouldn't it?

back to this...as we both agree, I didn't do anything to deserve a ban here.

**Papewaio** · 06-24-2005, 05:19

HorseArcher2-san,

I asked that your account of BrutalDictatorship be banned for direct violation of the Orgs rules:

Posts containing any generally objectionable material: knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law. Posting of copyrighted material, unless the copyright is owned by you or by The Guild, is discouraged. The Guild expects its patrons to remain civil even in the face of disagreements. Any kind of "flaming", slurs or insults adressed to an individual or a group is extremely inappropriate. Please respect etiquette at all times.

The exact issue is that you referred to others as Nazis. If you have an issue with the Ban the best place to post it is in the Watchtower forum. If you notice our Bans are not on people but accounts.

Regards,
Papewaio

**Colovion** · 06-24-2005, 05:24

John Stewart has some 'harsh' words for anyone referencing Hitler or Nazis during debates.

Please enjoy, I did:

haha, clik

**Simetrical** · 06-24-2005, 05:50

I've replied to your PM. The post where TosaInu banned you was here—apparently he stated his reasons in the thread, not in PM. Or maybe he PMd you too, I dunno.

-Simetrical

HorseArcher2 · 06-24-2005, 06:09

stating that totalwar.com uses "nazi tactics" and calling someone a "nazi" are two entirely separate things.

This is what some of you, especially mods, do on these forums...you take something that someone said, and you disagree with, then twist it around and distort it into meaning something that is, ironically, a "bannable offense".

Tell me how that is fair?

**InsaneApache** · 06-24-2005, 05:24

It's not my place to defend the mods, but I do have a couple of points...

If you have a problem with the mods then the thing to do is PM them, discussion on a thread is a clumsy way of dealing with it.

I'd also check out the forum rules if I were you.

This is in the wrong forum, try the watchtower.

Just my tuppenth worth...

EDIT: Pape beat me to it ....