This is EXACTLY what I was going to say. Look, I thought to myself, there goes one of those pigouvian subsidies again.It's just a Pigouvian subsidy. Perfectly rational behaviour in response to a positive externality![]()
(Seriously though every now and again amongst the dross you learn something new here, don't you?)
Anyway Your Highness I think you are in a minority of one , although the conservative in me would demand (only partly to annoy JAG) that we review the scheme to see how much staying on rates have risen and relate that to the net cost of the scheme (net because EMA may well simply replace a benefit you would have paid if they had left school anyway), and also have a look at the cost of running the means testing.
But I don't seriously expect the scheme to show anything other than a good return on the investment.
Bookmarks