It seems to me that those Americans who support the increased influence of Christian mythology on your judiciary processes are unable to make one important distinction when you are complaining about "anti-Christianity" in the SC:

These decisions are not meant to specifically "beat down" Christianity. They are meant to ensure that your government is not endorsing any religion.

But since you are all so supportive of Christian judges being allowed to have monuments citing religious scriptures in their courthouses, can I assume that you would be equally supportive if a Muslim-American judge wanted to mount stone tablets quoting passages of Shariah in her courthouse?