Poll: Who is the best military commander of all time?

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 176

Thread: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

  1. #1
    Bosna Member PittBull260's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    322

    Default Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    alright i saw this all over TV, some ppl say Genghis is the best military commander ever, some say Napoleon and some say Alexander, i wanna hear your opinions

    I personally think genghis khan is the best, he NEVER lost a battle under his command(or at least there is no record of it), and on all of his battles he was either lightly or heavily outnumbered..thats pretty amazing
    Last edited by PittBull260; 06-29-2005 at 04:46.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Khan.

    His tactics transcend time and technology.

    60 years ago they changed the name to blitzkrieg, today they call it Shock and Awe, but its all based on his style.

    I dont think much of Napoleon, and Alex was no better than Manstien in my opinion.

  3. #3
    Ja mata, TosaInu Forum Administrator edyzmedieval's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fortress of the Mountains
    Posts
    11,433

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Genghis Khan...

    He was a great commander....
    Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.

    Proud

    Been to:

    Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.

    A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?

  4. #4
    Ambiguous Member Byzantine Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?


    Alexander the Greatest

    One of the few people I actually look up to. Reading the history of his 9-year campaign opens my eyes to what the sons of Zeus can accomplish with the right motivation.

  5. #5
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    I dont think much of Napoleon
    I'm pretty sure that if Napoleon was German or American, you would be like "OMG, Napoleon is over-awesome !!"

    Genghis Khan is probably the best commander ever, as he faced a lot of different people with different strategy, and still achieved to defeat them all. He destroyed some of the most powerful empires that have ever existed with a group of steppe tribemen.
    Napoleon comes second (but far behind Genghis), as he fought against the most powerful empires of his time, almost conquered all of europe, and ruled a country that was about to crumble. But, in the end, he lost.
    As for Alexander, well, he fought against not really good commanders, and although the Persian Empire was wealthier and bigger than Macedonia, it was decaying from corruption and bad ruling, and collapsed after a few defeats. His biggest achievement was IMO to conquer and rule all of Greece rather than defeating the 'mighty' Persian Empire. But, just as Napoleon, in the end, he lost, as his empire disapeared right after his death.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Genghis by far...
    Friendship, Fun & Honour!

    "The Prussian army always attacks."
    -Frederick the Great

  7. #7
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Napoleon. He was on the most equal footing with his opponents in actual military power. Alexander had superior new methods at his disposal, whereas Temujin had the always considerable power of massed steppe-nomad hordes at his disposal - plus he got lucky. Had China not been in one of its "civil war and splinter states" periods at the time he'd probably never have become a Great Khan to begin with.

    As acute superiority in military method and pure conjecture are at best distantly derived from skill as a commander (unless the guy actually invented or introduced the better method), that leaves Napoleon. Plus unlike Genghis he actually pretty much did run the show by himself, which started backfiring when his physical condition and mental acuteness later began to detoriate.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  8. #8
    Humanist Senior Member Franconicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trying to get to Utopia
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Hard to compare. Each of them was great. Each of them had new better technologies and created new tatics to use it.
    After all I go for Genghi, because he created a new superpower that lasted. Napoleon knew how to win but he did not know how to end war and so he lost everything. Besides that, yes, he was a brillliant commander and much more than that

  9. #9
    Crusading historian Member cegorach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    2,523

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Napoleon.

  10. #10
    dictator by the people Member caesar44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the holy(?) land
    Posts
    1,207

    Smile Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Caesar-, the first man ever to ruled the land from the Atlantic to the Euphrates !
    "The essence of philosophy is to ask the eternal question that has no answer" (Aristotel) . "Yes !!!" (me) .

    "Its time we stop worrying, and get angry you know? But not angry and pick up a gun, but angry and open our minds." (Tupac Amaru Shakur)

  11. #11

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Where's Subetai, Jebe Noyen, Tokugawa Ieyasu, Belisarius, Manstein, or Kesselring?

  12. #12
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    From this trio its a close one but i will say Genghis Khan.He wasnt only a great strategist but i think his greatest achievement was to create the Horde at first place.I dont think it has been a easy task to take a bunch of freedom loving steppe people,and convert them to a most diciplined army of that time.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    I'm pretty sure that if Napoleon was German or American, you would be like "OMG, Napoleon is over-awesome !!"
    Keep the insults in the backroom or Ill be forced to combine the terms "surrender monkey" and "you are a" in the same sentence.

  14. #14
    Member Member Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lion City- Singapore
    Posts
    254

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Of course Genghis Khan
    From this land I was made
    For this land I will fall

  15. #15

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Chingis Khan, easily. Most of the negative comments here about opponents not being on equal terms etc are a little bit unfounded or at least very misguided. There was no element of luck in his conquests. Northern China was not completely conquered by the time he died and Muqali was left in command of the Chinese campaign while Chingis destroyed Khwarazm, completely outnumbered in both areas. Only one thing has prevented him being hailed as the superior commander he was. The large scale slaughter.

    Just to point out to PitBull 260, Chingis was defeated and it is well documented. Jamuqa defeated him at Dalan Balzhut in 1187 and again at Kalakalzhit, he was forced to withdraw to the swamps of Baljuna

    ......Orda

  16. #16
    Tovenaar Senior Member The Wizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,348

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Not Chingis, but Subedei.

    Oh, and Orda, we might as well ignore those losses. They were eventually overcome (and how!), just like Timur's early losses.



    ~Wiz
    Last edited by The Wizard; 06-29-2005 at 17:04.
    "It ain't where you're from / it's where you're at."

    Eric B. & Rakim, I Know You Got Soul

  17. #17
    Bosna Member PittBull260's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    322

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchman
    Temujin had the always considerable power of massed steppe-nomad hordes at his disposal - plus he got lucky. Had China not been in one of its "civil war and splinter states" periods at the time he'd probably never have become a Great Khan to begin with.
    yes he could.....he took on humoungous empires bigger and stronger than china at that time buddy..he would've demolished China even if it was united...

  18. #18
    Scruffy Looking Nerf Herder Member Steppe Merc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    7,907

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Chingis Khan for sure. Alexander was good, but his empire disentergrated even faster than Chingis', and his armies weren't near the level of Chingis. Chingis and his sucessors fought and won against armies that were far more diverse than Alexander's enemies.

    And Ceasar was nothing compared to Alexander, much less Chingis. Ceasar was just a politician, rather than a true warrior.

    Temujin had the always considerable power of massed steppe-nomad hordes at his disposal - plus he got lucky. Had China not been in one of its "civil war and splinter states" periods at the time he'd probably never have become a Great Khan to begin with.
    Not true at all. Temujin started out with no army at all, and built up an army taken from very diverse people, which he held together with his charisma and will.
    Last edited by Steppe Merc; 06-29-2005 at 18:07.

    "But if you should fall you fall alone,
    If you should stand then who's to guide you?
    If I knew the way I would take you home."
    Grateful Dead, "Ripple"

  19. #19
    Member Member Lodbrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    A very cold place.
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Genghis easily. Napolean and Alexander were both exceptional commanders but Gengis Khan was the greatest conquerer who ever lived.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Senior Member Oaty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,863

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    As far as conquering Alexander

    As for creating an empire Ghengis Khan. He looked to the future and even after his death the empire expanded.

    A bit unfair to bring Alexander into this as he was'nt expecting an early death in his early 30's.

    Would be quite interesting to see what happened if he lived to a ripe old age. But too likely as vast as an empire he created in such a short time, would fall apart upon his death. Just for the fact all the other kings would see it as a time to rebel.

    Napolean is quite out of the question IMO as his empire did'nt even last his lifetime.
    When a fox kills your chickens, do you kill the pigs for seeing what happened? No you go out and hunt the fox.
    Cry havoc and let slip the HOGS of war

  21. #21

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    i don't know whether the original poster meant statesmanship as in the longevity or craftmanship of the empires they founded back or just pure military ability so i will assume the latter.

    i would rank genghis, caesar and alexander above napoleon because they fought a variety of different enemies from civilized states to tribes whereas napoleon [with the exception of the egyptian sojourn] mainly fought against opponents with the same cultural and military organization as him. another important criterion would be strategic area but all three of these guys fought across a vast range. caesar campaigned between egypt and britain, alex between greece and india, genghis between china and iran. so they're all roughly equal there. when it comes to military organization caesar and alex refined armies that had been created by their predecessors but genghis khan created his from scratch.
    indeed

  22. #22

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Wizard
    Not Chingis, but Subedei.

    Oh, and Orda, we might as well ignore those losses. They were eventually overcome (and how!), just like Timur's early losses.



    ~Wiz
    Hello Wiz,
    Quite true but I wished to point out that the man was not completely invincible.

    The Subedei question is something that could be discussed. He was a veritable genius of strategy but let us not forget that he was initially the understudy of Jebe. Imagine what might have been had Jebe not died prematurely. They had become a very formidable partnership during their reconnaissance of the Black Sea area. Yet whatever they achieved, it was Chingis who noticed their potential. He was definitely not a ruler who relied on others to plan out his victories

    ......Orda

  23. #23
    robotica erotica Member Colovion's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Victoria, Canada
    Posts
    2,295

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    The Great Khan, no question.
    robotica erotica

  24. #24

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by oaty
    A bit unfair to bring Alexander into this as he was'nt expecting an early death in his early 30's.
    Unfortunately, Alexander's empire was already beginning to crumble just before his death. He wanted to go, his troops wanted to go home. Then he died, and the empire was split.

  25. #25
    dictator by the people Member caesar44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the holy(?) land
    Posts
    1,207

    Smile Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Steppe Merc
    Chingis Khan for sure. Alexander was good, but his empire disentergrated even faster than Chingis', and his armies weren't near the level of Chingis. Chingis and his sucessors fought and won against armies that were far more diverse than Alexander's enemies.

    And Ceasar was nothing compared to Alexander, much less Chingis. Ceasar was just a politician, rather than a true warrior.


    Not true at all. Temujin started out with no army at all, and built up an army taken from very diverse people, which he held together with his charisma and will.




    1. Caesar was a soldier , please...
    2. He took gaul
    3. He took Egypt
    4. He was the first "non barbaric" in britannia
    5. He conquered any (that is any) roman opponent
    6. He took asia minor
    And on and on
    20 years of military success , and you call him a politician...
    He was elegant , but he died like a soldier
    "The essence of philosophy is to ask the eternal question that has no answer" (Aristotel) . "Yes !!!" (me) .

    "Its time we stop worrying, and get angry you know? But not angry and pick up a gun, but angry and open our minds." (Tupac Amaru Shakur)

  26. #26
    Tovenaar Senior Member The Wizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,348

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Orda Khan
    Hello Wiz,
    Quite true but I wished to point out that the man was not completely invincible.

    The Subedei question is something that could be discussed. He was a veritable genius of strategy but let us not forget that he was initially the understudy of Jebe. Imagine what might have been had Jebe not died prematurely. They had become a very formidable partnership during their reconnaissance of the Black Sea area. Yet whatever they achieved, it was Chingis who noticed their potential. He was definitely not a ruler who relied on others to plan out his victories

    ......Orda
    True, in terms of seeing potential and seizing it, Chingis has no equal. One sees it all through his reign -- from the khuriltai where he was proclaimed khakhan until his very death, where he had all witnesses of his burial executed so as to forever preserve the mystery and interest surrounding his death and therefore his person (okay, debatable, but a sound hypothesis even though I say so myself).

    Caesar44: Caesar was an equal of the others... within the boundaries in which he acted. Caesar was more a man who took what was provided by the generations that came before him, and combined that with his own abilities and tactfulness. He is clearly outshined in statesmanship by Alexander and Chingis Khan in turn.

    On the tactical side, I find Lucius Lucinius Lucullus an equal if not greater general. But that is pure tactics and strategy; Lucullus completely lacked Caesar's charisma with the troops.

    As said, Caesar performed very well within his own theater of operations; but overall he is easily outshined by others. He is higher in my book than Pyrrhus or Hannibal (stategically), though.



    ~Wiz
    "It ain't where you're from / it's where you're at."

    Eric B. & Rakim, I Know You Got Soul

  27. #27
    Scruffy Looking Nerf Herder Member Steppe Merc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    7,907

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    4. He was the first "non barbaric" in britannia
    Britians were not barbaric, nor were any of his enemies.

    This is why I find Chingis the best. He built his empire from scratch. Sure the nomadic tribes already existed, and the basic soldier type had existed for centuries, but there wasn't really any Mongol leader that he inherited his army or land from. Alex got his army from Philip, and while he certaintly improved it, Philip was going to invade Persia anyway.
    And Caesar had far more prior advacments that he took advantage of. The army was there, Rome had already fought with Gaul and Iberia and Asia Minor.

    "But if you should fall you fall alone,
    If you should stand then who's to guide you?
    If I knew the way I would take you home."
    Grateful Dead, "Ripple"

  28. #28

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Orda Khan
    Hello Wiz,
    Quite true but I wished to point out that the man was not completely invincible.

    The Subedei question is something that could be discussed. He was a veritable genius of strategy but let us not forget that he was initially the understudy of Jebe. ......Orda
    Hmm. I can only look at awe at Subedei strategy but there is a suggestion that Jebe might have been the better tactician. I doubt we have the data to make a judgement. However, from what what we know of his age, Chingis must have subdued China without him which is no mean feat - just not one we know a lot about.

    I would add Hannibal to the list too.

  29. #29
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    The poll is somewhat misnamed: it says "military commander" but it lists conquering heads of state who lead in the field. To me that means you must weigh their ability not only to lead an army to win campaigns, but to hold an empire together/rule at the same time--a much more challenging task since there are many more strategic aspects to consider.

    Genghis Khan would probably be at or near the top for head of state/commander. Napoleon would come in 2nd to him because of the severity and nature of the reverses he suffered. Caesar could certainly be placed in there as well. Alexander is a tough call, partly because he inherited a system built to conquer the world of the time, partly because of his opposition, and partly because he didn't conquer to the West, nor did he live long enough to show that he could manage things. He was an ultra aggressive field commander, and with the force he had, and the opposition he faced it, served him well. What isn't clear is if he could have performed as well vs. other great commanders.

    Now if we go strictly by military command abilities: Hannibal would probably be #1 in my book. (I think he would have beaten Alexander based on personality differences.) Had he actually been leading Carthaginian govt directly, he would have won the war vs. Rome.

    Wellington probably deserves a mention here as would Scipio Africanus. Wellington was brilliant, but never really faced Napoleon on what could be considered even terms. Ditto for Scipio vs. Hannibal at Zama.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

  30. #30

    Default Re: Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

    I think that in order to gather some facts so that we can compare the three
    aforementioned leaders,i feel i have to pose the following question:

    How and in which way did each one of these men contribute to the evolution of warfare?
    Vae Victis

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO