Genghis Khan or Napoleon or Alexander?

[caesar44]

If we went by the rule of "Success in the end makes a good general." then we'd have a very skewed system. George Washington for example.. terrible general, but a great leader of men. He won, so does that change the fact that he wasn't a good general? Not really.

Please measure Caesar on every aspect -
1. Tactic
2. Strategy
3. political ability
4. Luck
5. Success
6. Leadership
7. Popularity
8. Ambition
9. Determination
10. Perspective - you know , he visited some temple of Alexander the great , then he came out to his soldiers with tears , they asked him why he cries , Caesar said , "I am nearly 40 years old , what have I achieved compare to him when he was 33" , 15 years afterwards , Caesar was the first man ever to control the land from the Atlantic to the Euphrates (he took the empire , not received it like the emperors in later times) .
Now , remember , in the first 2 month of 44ce , Caesar planed his campaigns against the Gaetae and against the Parthians....but alas , the rest is history , he was so arrogant and I belive he wanted to die as he did (he entered the senate with out bodyguard , knowing about the plot)