Well, other than to make a dig at Americans, there's no reason to call George Washington a terrorist. Using that kind of moral equivalency, I could say (AND I AM NOT) there's no difference between Nazi Germany and Imperial Britain. You could say that George Washington was a partisan, but partisan does not equal terrorist.
Why wasn't George Washington a terrorist? Because his attacks focused exclusively on military targets. Show me one verifiable instance of him attacking loyalist civilians without military value and I'll stand up and loudly proclaim him a terrorist. Until then, I think you ought to keep that sort of rubbish to yourself.
Bookmarks