The War on "some" Terrorism

[Tribesman]

By the way, for someone so outspoken about the need for the Gitmo detainees to get fair trials, you dont seem to concerned about the "justice" this guy would get in Cuba
Yes Panzer "fair trials" , since this person has already been convicted , and is an escaped convict who entered your country as an illegal immigrant wanted for international terrorism I would have thought that you would be glad to get rid of him , since he seems to fit all of the criteria of persons who you feel are major threats to you .
As he has gone on record several times admitting his guilt (just in case you were in any doubt) then any trial would just be a formality .

for the time being its better that America demonstrates it doesnt betray its agents
Maybe it would be a better demonstration if America didn't support terrorists in the first place .

[Don Corleone]

Perhaps I should remind everyone I think they should proceed with turning this guy over to Interpol, or some other 3rd party that, if they decide to give him to Castro, with his human right's record, then at least it's not on our hands. Asylum should not be an option for somebody who went around blowing up children, Cuban or any other variety.

And Al Khalifah, your 2nd sentance invalidates nothing I said. You said:

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

A freedom fighter, or partisan, is a non-regular soldier that attacks military targets of an opposing force. A terrorist is one who specifically targets civilian targets. If you think the two are morally equivalent and cannot see a difference, I suppose the conversation ends here.