I'm not a big fan of liberal reporters with an agenda, and I think the NY Times isn't fit to line a birdcage. But I really, really think the ruling on this sucks. Reporters have to be free to protect their sources if we are to have a free press. Not being able to document the sources should count significantly against the crediblity of the story, but a reporter's notes should not be able to be subpoenaed by a prosecutor or a judge. I think this is a terrible blow to freedom of the press. Anyone have any thoughts?

Don't speak to the press