I think the poll results tell it all.
0-29-8-0.
I love Final Fantasy VI. The game is at least a decade old, done in 16-bit, but the game is fantastic.
Final Fantasy X. Looks great, but the characters are boring, and the plot is daft.
Azi
Re: Graphics VS gameplay.
I think the poll results tell it all.
0-29-8-0.
I love Final Fantasy VI. The game is at least a decade old, done in 16-bit, but the game is fantastic.
Final Fantasy X. Looks great, but the characters are boring, and the plot is daft.
Azi
Mark Twain 1881"If you don't want to work, become a reporter. That awful power, the public opinion of the nation, was created by a horde of self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditch digging and shoemaking and fetched up journalism on their way to the poorhouse."
Re: Graphics VS gameplay.
gameplay is definatley most important, but i do love nice graphics
Re: Graphics VS gameplay.
i say they are both equal
because after having been spoiled by great graphics combined with great gameplay in many modern games, i am now accustomed to having great graphics
due to constant exposure to great graphics, it has become an expected norm for me.
hence if i play a game with bad graphics, then i am constantly thinking: "wow, these are some really bad graphics!" i am always mentally comparing the environments in a game with obsolete graphics to the environments of all the games i've played that have great graphics. hence i cannot enjoy the gameplay of a game with bad graphics, no matter how great
the exceptions to this for me are games that i grew up with. i can still enjoy those because they are part of my soul and remind me of good times in my childhood.
Re: Graphics VS gameplay.
For flightsims, certainly for civilian flightsims like MSFS 2004, graphics are pretty much on par with gameplay. Eye candy is the whole raison d'etre of the genre.
Unto each good man a good dog
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks