I think I got some of the details wrong, and a friend was explaining them to me. The tapes were actually supressed by Bernardo's lawyer; he actually walked into the house after they had searched it, and found them (after Bernardo told them where they were--in a light fixture in the bathroom, I think). So, Homolka didn't give them the tapes. They needed her testimony. Now, according to my friend, after she gave the testimony, she also remembered a few other things she did that she had forgotten to mention, but they didn't try her on those. Let me see if I can find it.Originally Posted by Papewaio
I guess what I'm saying is that she got off on a much lighter sentence than she should have due to prosecutorial negligence. This to me seems poetic justice, rather than vengeance. I don't think she is contrite at all; she used the system to get out of jail time.
Bookmarks