![]()
Is Mary the mother just the womb. While Jesus was placed there wholly of God.
The Son, The Ghost and The Spirit are one.
Wouldn't this make Jesus a clone of God?
![]()
![]()
Is Mary the mother just the womb. While Jesus was placed there wholly of God.
The Son, The Ghost and The Spirit are one.
Wouldn't this make Jesus a clone of God?
![]()
Ever played Xenogears?
Sorry, that was the first thing that popped into my head.
Anyway, back on topic, I'd say...no. While the three are one, they are also three. Each part of the trinity has its own role and is a separate manifestation of God.
At least that is my understanding. But man, you sure do see some fun stuff in our forums![]()
Azi
Mark Twain 1881"If you don't want to work, become a reporter. That awful power, the public opinion of the nation, was created by a horde of self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditch digging and shoemaking and fetched up journalism on their way to the poorhouse."
I'm just trying to be fashionable with the latest trend of threads which are contrasting God and Technology/Science.
I wonder does this mix make me a Fundamentalist Nerd?
Not at all. Just normally nuts......Originally Posted by Papewaio
![]()
I guess it goes by interpretation if Mary was the mother of Jesus, I know Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Lutherans all believe that Mary was the legitimate mother of Jesus, but Anglicans, Methodists, and every other protestant off shoot believes the opposite, she was just a womb (however morbid that sounds). I believe in a mythical sense Jesus was both man and god, much like Heracles, he was certainly mortal and throughout his life he had a difficult time coming to terms with his power (thats why in the Bible he goes from being age 10 to age 30 and it skips the middle years). I think a more correct term would be to associate Jesus and Holy Ghost, Jesus is a mortal Man, the Holy Ghost is Jesus and therefore god in spirit.
The Trinity....
It's not a whole thing, but 3 separate spiritualities....
Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.
Proud![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Been to:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.
A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?
I hate when people compare jesus to Heracles. Heracles was half man, half god. Where as Jesus is said to be fully human and fully god. This is a concept that is in no other religion.
Jesus isnt a clone of God, as he is God. People confuse god the father with God, when the father is just part of God.
There is the trinity, God the father, God the son, and the Holy spirit. All which are fully God. Therefore, Jesus isnt a clone of God, he is God, just as much as the Father is.
I know it is a complicated deal, but it is part of what makes christianity so intristing.
It makes it boring and irrelevent. who really cares... god the father, the son, and the spirit... all religions borrow things from other religions to make it sound more appealing.
Erm, doesn't that make it a polytheistic religion?Originally Posted by King of Atlantis
"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith
dont know what that means. You mean more than one God? They are all the differnt parts of the same God, like the three leaves of a three leaf clover. They are all part of the plant of God, but they are separte leaves.Originally Posted by Zalmoxis
Wazikashi, empty insults on religion dont prove/disprove anything.
I always was told God was the sum of three parts; the Father, the Holy Ghost and Jesus. Like an egg with a shell, yolk and the white.
I went to an Episcopal church and I'm now an atheist, fwiw.
Papewaio,Originally Posted by Papewaio
be careful! The trinity is very dizzying. Most heretics were burned because they jumbled this![]()
Trinity seems to be an old concept. There was also the main celtic good that appear in three different configurations. Same with the Christian god. Sometime you see him as god father, sometime as the son, sometimes as the holy ghost. But it is always the same god. (Well most of the time you do not see him/her at all)
The problem that I see is that no one really knows what a god is. Does anybody have a proper definition? One that even I will understand?
Didn't the Byzantines (among many others, I'm sure) wage some nasty revolts/civil wars about this?
from the way i always understood the concept - God is like the contents of a large wine barrel
when you take a mug and fill it with the wine - the shell is different, but it is no less the wine
different forms of cups do not change the contents (not taking into consideration sediments from cups and what not) and they do not make the contents any less of the original make-up
either way - it is illogical and i dont buy it - but that is the explanation i have adopted
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
TuffStuff,
it is like this: You have a good wine. It has a certain colour, smell and taste. So it is one single wine but you recognize it in three different ways.
One only has to get into the history of the church to realize that the Trinitarian doctrine is utterly based on confusion and a mad man’s ideas.
There shouldn’t be such a doctrine and the church did in fact fluctuate between Trinitarianism and Arianism.
It was Athanasius who got it all confused with the Jesus is God/Jesus has always been a God logical conundrum.
Even Augustine had serious problems understanding this doctrine as he replied with: I don’t know, to some of the letters that asked about this doctrine.
Status Emeritus
![]()
Pape, you?! Never!Originally Posted by Papewaio
GARCIN: I "dreamt," you say. It was no dream. When I chose the hardest path, I made my choice deliberately. A man is what he wills himself to be.
INEZ: Prove it. Prove it was no dream. It's what one does, and nothing else, that shows the stuff one's made of.
GARCIN: I died too soon. I wasn't allowed time to - to do my deeds.
INEZ: One always dies too soon - or too late. And yet one's whole life is complete at that moment, with a line drawn neatly under it, ready for the summing up. You are - your life, and nothing else.
Jean Paul Sartre - No Exit 1944
no Jesus is not a clone of God
Jesus, God the Father, and the Holy Spirit are all 3 distinct personalities of God
they are all God. yet distinct personalities of God
each of them is every bit as much "God" as all the others, even though they are not exactly the same
i know it's complicated, and unfortunately i am not the best at explaining this concept but hopefully that answers the question to some degree
Would that make them all stem cells?
"I love this fellow God. He's so deliciously evil." --Stuart Griffin
Maybe God is schizophrenic![]()
Wheel down, wheel down to southward! Oh, Gooverooska, go!
And tell the Deep-Sea Viceroys the story of our woe;
Ere, empty as the shark's egg the tempest flings ashore,
The Beaches of Lukannon shall know their sons no more!
Rudyard Kipling, Lukannon
God has multiple personalities...Originally Posted by Navaros
"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith
Maybe Jesus just is a dude that was at the wrong place at the wrong time ????
maybe, but i disagree.Originally Posted by bmolsson
You mean like the wiping out of the Arians (followers of Arius teachings) who belived:Originally Posted by Proletariat
From wikithat the Logos (Jesus) and the Father were not of the same essence;
that the Son was a created being; and
that though He was the creator of the worlds, and must therefore have existed before them and before all time, there was a "time" [although Arius refused to use words meaning time, such as cronos or aion] when He did not exist.
Or the struggle with the monophysists in Egypt, that belived that Jesus was only divine, not human+divine. Seen speculations that the reason behind this was that Maria=Isis (the Gud-birther). And all those wierd concepts about Jesus' nature created when attempting to create something that all sides accepted.
So yes, the Byz had some (quite big) problems about this.
We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?
Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED
It has often been asserted by historians that one of the reasons for the rapidity of the Muslim conquests in the 7th century was that the Byzantines had alienated much of their own population due to religious controversies and religious repression. The monophysites in Egypt, for example, did better under the more tolerant Muslims, or so the argument goes.
"I love this fellow God. He's so deliciously evil." --Stuart Griffin
According to those yokel priests that I grew up around, God is somehow made up of three parts. This makes no sense considering Jesus refering to god as his father in the Bible. If he's God too how come he calls his father God as well?![]()
This would seem like it's a huge deal but considering how many contradictions exist within the Christian doctrine it's not a big ripple in the water. There's other things I could kill my neighbor for believing if you know what I mean?![]()
The fact of the matter St.Augustine and St.Paul(the people most responsible for making Christianity what it is) weren't exactly intelligent individuals as far as I can see, they both contradicted eachother and made stuff up for their own convenience with no real aim.
That's always being a mystery to me. Why were the middle years skipped and for many our formative years.Originally Posted by Wazikashi
We work to live, and to live is to, play "Total War" or drive a VR-4
I think that it was because not much happened to him in this period, until his baptism and the start of him preaching.Originally Posted by kiwitt
I might be wrong, though...
"Look I’ve got my old pledge card a bit battered and crumpled we said we’d provide more turches churches teachers and we have I can remember when people used to say the Japanese are better than us the Germans are better than us the French are better than us well it’s great to be able to say we’re better than them I think Mr Kennedy well we all congratulate on his baby and the Tories are you remembering what I’m remembering boom and bust negative equity remember Mr Howard I mean are you thinking what I’m thinking I’m remembering it’s all a bit wonky isn’t it?"
-Wise words from John Prescott
There were a few books about Jesus when he was younger that weren't included in the final Bible I believe.
"But if you should fall you fall alone,
If you should stand then who's to guide you?
If I knew the way I would take you home."
Grateful Dead, "Ripple"
Some Christians make the argument that God is All, and therefore everything is an extension of the Godhead. If you accept that position, there's no conflict between Jesus being human and being God.
Where that line of reasoning runs into trouble, of course, is when you ask "So why are there so many bad things/people?" Next thing you know you've got the Book of Job out, and it's game over.
Bookmarks