Barbarian Invasion question

**Mikeus Caesar** · 07-10-2005, 15:54

Originally Posted by Brutus

It appears to be bigger then the original map, though...

Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you look closely, the map is the same size as the current one.

**The Stranger** · 07-10-2005, 16:06

that's why we have 1000nds of players that are happy to change everything to custom use. i always mod it to what i like, i'm even going to mod EB when it's out.

btw is RTR 6.0 out

**Ianofsmeg16** · 07-10-2005, 19:12

Originally Posted by Emperor Umeu 1

btw is RTR 6.0 out

Please clarfy? where can i see this ofr myself

**Krauser** · 07-11-2005, 01:12

Originally Posted by Mikeus Caesar

Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you look closely, the map is the same size as the current one.

We're talking about the number of provinces. It seems like there are more big provinces instead of lots of small ones. Expansion packs are usually made to add something to the game not reduce the current length of it. Like I said before though, I just want the AI fixed.

**lars573** · 07-11-2005, 03:36

Originally Posted by Krauser

We're talking about the number of provinces. It seems like there are more big provinces instead of lots of small ones. Expansion packs are usually made to add something to the game not reduce the current length of it. Like I said before though, I just want the AI fixed.

You know in 364 AD the Roman empire was only about 13 "provinces" (well by that time they had been changed to diocese). This is one time you should be glad CA isn't being historically accurate. Below territorial divisions of the Roman empire in 330 AD under Constantine I. These apllied until the western empire collapesed in 476 AD.

CA has instead chosen to make provinces based on these bounderies.

100 years out of date but not bad none the less

**Mongoose** · 07-11-2005, 03:50

WTH ever happened to "Gameplay > realism"???

There are not nearly enough provinces in RTW as it is.

**Krauser** · 07-11-2005, 04:22

Originally Posted by lars573

You know in 364 AD the Roman empire was only about 13 "provinces" (well by that time they had been changed to diocese). This is one time you should be glad CA isn't being historically accurate. Below territorial divisions of the Roman empire in 330 AD under Constantine I. These apllied until the western empire collapesed in 476 AD.

CA has instead chosen to make provinces based on these bounderies.

100 years out of date but not bad none the less

Well ok, I think it's fine to have less provinces but each province should have more cities to take over in order to control the whole province. This would be more realistic and still have the length of the original.

**lars573** · 07-11-2005, 04:28

Next time maybe. Not this time.

**Brutus** · 07-11-2005, 21:32

Hey, has anyone seen the screenshots on the SEGA-site?
http://www.sega-europe.com/en/media_...ots___2944.htm
As you can see on pic nr. 9, there seems to be a city with a river next to it! I've never seen that before...would be a nice addition, I think. Also, who are the strange dudes on pic 11?

**Viking** · 07-12-2005, 15:59

I had only seen a few of them before.

Thanks alot

Those dudes on pic 11 are the battlepriests I think. They might look scary but if I don`t remember wrong they had the same stats as peasants.

**Mongoose** · 07-12-2005, 19:01

Originally Posted by Brutus

Hey, has anyone seen the screenshots on the SEGA-site?
http://www.sega-europe.com/en/media_...ots___2944.htm
As you can see on pic nr. 9, there seems to be a city with a river next to it! I've never seen that before...would be a nice addition, I think. Also, who are the strange dudes on pic 11?

Christ's holy clubmen