well...Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
By mentioning the terror bombings in London first, and then using the phrase 'millions of Islamic immigrants', the article is implying that these millions of Islamic immigrants are supporters of the attcks, which they plainly don't.But as last week’s bombings in London illustrate, turning millions of Islamic immigrants into “Europeans,” however you define the term, is a dubious proposition.
The vast majority of muslims deplore terrorism. And as for Christian terrorists, how about the IRA? A lot of the IRA violence was due to protestant/catholic tensions.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
No, it's because of a reduced need of children for labour and the economic cost of children. I don't think that these people would have more children if they were more 'obedient' to Christianity (anyway, when did Christianity say that you had to have large families?)Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
That's because in the rest of the world (the 'developing' parts), large numbers of children are economically useful, since they provide extra labour.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
Actually, due to immigration, most can.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
Immigrants hardly come in enough strength for this supposed 'takeover' you are talking about. They sustain economies. And although some don't, many immigrants do integrate into the society they move into.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkney
Bookmarks