I didn't say they had. I said, in fact, you could find lunatics anywhere. (Atheism, Christians, Jews, whatever)Originally Posted by Goofball
I didn't say they had. I said, in fact, you could find lunatics anywhere. (Atheism, Christians, Jews, whatever)Originally Posted by Goofball
Thats a pretty lame list. So you have a few nuts who dont represent any organized or recognised christain church vs millions of Muslim extremists. There is NO comparison. Also they dont represent anywhere near the danger of radical Islam.As you can see, Islamic extremists haven't cornered the market on crazy. There are plenty of good, wholesome, God-fearing Christians performing violent acts for the glory of God.
Blame both but it seems that Islam is a far more fertile place as far as producing nuts goes.So, is it really fair to blame Islam and Christianity in their entirety, or do you think it's perhaps more reasonable to blame the nuts in both religions who by all accounts are acting in contrary to the true teachings of their faiths?
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Which millions would these be?Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
"Look I’ve got my old pledge card a bit battered and crumpled we said we’d provide more turches churches teachers and we have I can remember when people used to say the Japanese are better than us the Germans are better than us the French are better than us well it’s great to be able to say we’re better than them I think Mr Kennedy well we all congratulate on his baby and the Tories are you remembering what I’m remembering boom and bust negative equity remember Mr Howard I mean are you thinking what I’m thinking I’m remembering it’s all a bit wonky isn’t it?"
-Wise words from John Prescott
I believe its accepted that only ten percent of Muslims could be called radicals. Do the math. What percentage of christains would fit this same criteria?
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
"I believe its (sic) accepted..."?Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
Hmmm.
When statements are made in the passive voice it usually means one of three things:
1) I really don't know what I'm talking about but I am trying to sound like I do;
2) I am making a statement that I believe, but I have no way of backing it up;
3) I am a government employee and I don't want to tie my own name to the statement I am making.
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
Yes, I'm curious as to the answer to that question as well.Originally Posted by Marcellus
"What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"
- TSM
Heres a few
![]()
So tell me how many do you think there are?
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
So tell me how many do you think there are?
Ummmm...... 5 if you include the cameraman , whats the prize , what have I won ?![]()
You think the one in the hole is a radical? Sorry you loseUmmmm...... 5 if you include the cameraman , whats the prize , what have I won ?![]()
Ive heard this figure many times but certainly we dont know the actual numbers . Maybe you could enlighten us all. Lets say its 1 percent. How many does that give you?1) I really don't know what I'm talking about but I am trying to sound like I do;
Thats more like it but i will try to .I am making a statement that I believe, but I have no way of backing it up;
No way I work for the government.I am a government employee and I don't want to tie my own name to the statement I am making.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Bookmarks