Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 31

Thread: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

  1. #1

    Default Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    As we've seen from screenshots, Barbarian Invasions looks like it's going to have fewer, larger provinces than RTW.

    I know many people jumped on this with annoyance, that they expected more provinces from BI, not fewer - and yet in the past I have also come across people railing against the game for being "Rome Total Siege" as they resented the number of cities they had to conquer - even more so in the mods that take the number of settlements to their limits.

    So, people like field battles, people like their sieges to be significant and not just one in a chain, yet people still like to have individual territories as closely defined as possible.

    Which do you prefer, and why?
    .
    Epistolary Richard's modding Rules of Cool
    Cool modders make their mods with the :mod command line switch
    If they don't, then Cool mod-users use the Mod Enabler (JSGME)
    Cool modders use show_err
    Cool modders use the tutorials database Cool modders check out the Welcome to the Modding Forums! thread Cool modders keep backups Cool modders help each other out

  2. #2
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    i like medium, i do think that the map of RTR and EB are to big but in someway it is also cool. i think the vanilla map was the best though.

    i always autoresolve sieges (when i'm the attacking side) and i fight in a way that i deplete the defending side by luring them into an openterrain battle, it always work. i have a cool battle somtimes outnumbered 1:20 (physicly) and i dont have to fight in a town.

    We do not sow.

  3. #3
    Caged for your safety Member RabidGibbon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Leeds.
    Posts
    356

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I prefer a larger province in general, but having said that I can't play the Sarmatians, because theirs just too much ground to cover between each city.

    Yet Siegeathons are remarkably dull. A happy medium for me would be Gaul and Iberia.

  4. #4
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    yeah.

    We do not sow.

  5. #5
    Idiot Slayer Member bubbanator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Look behind you...
    Posts
    161

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Yes, I would have to agree. I can't stand playing as the Numidians just because it takes five turns to get anywhere at all. However, if I was fighting field battles in those five turns...

    But I think that the size of the provinces in Iberia in vinilla are nearly perfect size. Not too big, not too small.
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups...

    "Incompetence - When you earnestly believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. "

  6. #6

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Larger territories would be fine if movement weren't so ridiculously slow. But it is, which makes big territories a serious annoyance (especially since they tend to be impoverished anyway, which makes it a lot of movement for little gain).

  7. #7
    Not affiliated with Red Dwarf. Member Ianofsmeg16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Home of Palm trees, cats with no tails, three-legged men, fairies...and more german bikers than germany
    Posts
    1,996

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I think that the EB map is great, its a huge map but the provinces arent seperated by that much at all, its a great map....if someone did that just after BI is released it would make it a AWESOME game, even with the bugs....
    When I was a child
    I caught a fleeting glimpse
    Out of the corner of my eye.
    I turned to look but it was gone
    I cannot put my finger on it now
    The child is grown,
    The dream is gone.
    I have become comfortably numb...

    Proud Supporter of the Gahzette

  8. #8
    Member Member TB666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Malmö, Sweden
    Posts
    1,519

    Default Sv: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I tend to like big provinces more.
    The small ones have their advantages but the bigger is more for me.
    Sure it takes a while to get to the city but the AI might intercept you with an army so you might have a decisive battle over the province in the open instead of in the city and that is far more cooler then sieges.

  9. #9
    Don't worry, I don't exist Member King of Atlantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ruins of Atlantis a.k.a Florida
    Posts
    1,658

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    In big provinces you have to travel way to far, plus less cities means less armies, so you are doing relatively the same amount of sieges. Plus managment is rediculous. I like EB's map, but i think rtr went to far with adding.

  10. #10
    Chief Biscuit Monitor Member professorspatula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Inside a shoe.
    Posts
    1,158

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I'd like to see a bit of a smaller map, but divided into more regions. The AI really struggles to co-ordinate its forces where there are vast open spaces and its too easy to pick off its numerous small armies between each settlement. But when you have lots of settlements in close proximity, you get more battles and sieges and its a bit more like the Risk element of the previous Total War games whereby the AI can respond quicker to your own armies moving into attack. So more cities with less space between each one, but not necessarily a greater sized map is my preference. I want there to be a greater enemy presence nearby whenever possible. That said, it could turn into a bit of a chore to proceed, but at least you won't have to spend 4 turns just to move your army to attack the next nearest settlement.
    Improving the TW Series one step at a time:

    BI Extra Hordes & Unlocked Factions Mod: Available here.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Is normal for the desert,arid and unfertil parts of the map...to be less populated...therefore are bigger..nobody wants them..the temperature too is a factor...i preffer more fertil lands if u ask me so can be more provinces
    Last edited by Coldfish; 08-12-2005 at 22:44.

  12. #12
    Member Member sunsmountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Anything that shortens the campaign game. That means Big provinces.

    Should also encourage more battles in the field (instead of near cities), which i like better. The path-finding in cities is better, but i dont find it a fun place to fight... sorry CA.
    in montem soli non loquitur

    (\_/) (>.<) That's what happens with bunnies
    (x.X)(_)(_) who want to achieve world domination!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  13. #13
    Member Member Mr Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    In a chair
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Quote Originally Posted by sunsmountain
    Anything that shortens the campaign game. That means Big provinces.

    Should also encourage more battles in the field (instead of near cities), which i like better. The path-finding in cities is better, but i dont find it a fun place to fight... sorry CA.
    I prefer long campaigns myself . I wish that C/A had retained the option for a Glory campaign like they had in MTW . The race to own X amount of provinces does nothing for me ; building a strong , prosperous and stable kingdom/empire and maintaining it over generation however strongly appeals .

    The ideal would ofcourse be designed with sufficient options to satisfy both preferences . I think it could be done with enough ingenuity .
    7 out of 10 people like me ,
    I'm not going to change for the other three .

  14. #14
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Big provinces sucks. You wouldn't like to walk around for like 3-5 turns (about 2 years!) just trying to get to another settlement. That really sucks. Imagine Steppes provinces all over the place...

  15. #15
    Member Member CMcMahon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    160

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Smaller. Mo' money, mo' problems.

  16. #16
    Cynic Senior Member sapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    yes - i think rtr provinces are damn near perfect - more to conquer, more challenging opponents
    From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
    We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer

  17. #17
    robotica erotica Member Colovion's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Victoria, Canada
    Posts
    2,295

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    The size of Provinces has nearly nothing to do with what I care for; it's the amount of settlements within said provinces I would like to see changed.

    Presently you control the whole countryside from a single fortified position. While this might have been acceptable for STW, MTW and RTW - I hope to high heavens that their next title will expand upon the options of capturing geographical territory. I'd like to see at least two cities per province, three for some.
    robotica erotica

  18. #18
    Legendary Member Taurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kwang Tung
    Posts
    1,985

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Quote Originally Posted by sapi
    yes - i think rtr provinces are damn near perfect - more to conquer, more challenging opponents
    I agree with you. Although generally I prefer smaller provinces to larger ones owned by the likes of Scythia (vanilla) and Sarmatians (rtr)

    - Vip3r

  19. #19
    Merkismathr of Birka Member PseRamesses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Birka town in Svitjod. Realm of the Rus and the midnight sun.
    Posts
    1,939

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    With only 20 factions present, 200 provinces available size doesn´t matter. RTW is clearly a total war game with a diplomacy feature that really doesn´t work so eventually you´ll be at war with everyone. To delay that, the more province there are the better for build up etc on your part.
    Trying out different mods it´s evident that a map like MM, with fever starting provinces and more rebels around a "total war game" is distant. Now in the vanilla game it´s eminent from the start and with RTR some 10-15 into the game (unless you´re playing the Seleucids or Greeks, he he!) My personal playstyle requires build up and semi-pressure from the surrounding factions. I don´t like to go blitz on my neighbours just to prevent them fron doing it to me, it´s simply not realistic.
    This is why I´ll go with the maximum amount of provinces any day.

  20. #20
    dictator by the people Member caesar44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the holy(?) land
    Posts
    1,207

    Smile Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    A smaller map with more provinces , it will be more realistic .
    Why we should have all these territories in Central Asia , Arabia and North Africa ? Huge territories with 1 or 2 factions with 3 or 4 provinces
    To take Italy (a small territory) you must conquer 8-10 provinces in contras with Sarmatia . and to think about the army march per turn....damn !!!
    "The essence of philosophy is to ask the eternal question that has no answer" (Aristotel) . "Yes !!!" (me) .

    "Its time we stop worrying, and get angry you know? But not angry and pick up a gun, but angry and open our minds." (Tupac Amaru Shakur)

  21. #21
    Member Member Shaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    282

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    well the BI map has a little too few provs eg.

    Italy-4

    iberia-4

    the balkans-4 (greece=2, macedonia and greece)

    anatolia(turkey)-5

    middle east(not including anatolia)-10

    north africa-4(inc egypt)

    now i got this info from my BI map.

  22. #22
    Lord of the Kanto Senior Member ToranagaSama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I know many people jumped on this with annoyance, that they expected more provinces from BI, not fewer - and yet in the past I have also come across people railing against the game for being "Rome Total Siege" as they resented the number of cities they had to conquer - even more so in the mods that take the number of settlements to their limits.
    I'm one of those that think a name change would be appropriate.

    I would like to see more provinces not fewer, but the true issue is not with the number of provinces, but rather the fact that Sieges are too great a part of taking EVERY province.

    Taking a castle here and there is would be fun and interesting and a good break from the normal battlefield battles; but having to take a Castle *every* time is tedious, and not what i'm seeking in a TW game.

    Lining up Army to army on the field of battle is what the game is about.

    What might be a MUCH better effect is to give the AI the capability to *judge* the real potential outcome of a *siege* battle and judge the value of engaging in a siege.

    For example, the game s/h the capability to compel the Besieged to surrender. Of course there s/b a good many varying factors to the outcome of a *demand-to-surrender*.

    "Surrender you scum! or, I'll killer every last one of you. I'll rape your mothers and sisters. I'll cut off the genitals of your fathers. I'll burn the countryside, reduce your homes to rubble, and leave you naked to suffer, starve and recall my wraith. Surrender be your only hope. Surrender and Live."

    Of course CA didn't make any significant improvements to the AI, so what is their solution? Reduce the number of provinces and reduce the number and tedium of Sieges. A *Kludge* fix if ever there was one. So be it, par for the course!
    In Victory and Defeat there is much honor
    For valor is a gift And those who posses it
    Never know for certain They will have it
    When the next test comes....


    The next test is the MedMod 3.14; strive with honor.
    Graphics files and Text files
    Load Graphics 1st, Texts 2nd.

  23. #23
    Could be your God Member Abokasee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    1,487

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    new citys during the game will come because barbain rebel tribes if left long enthough will become a proper faction!
    Now with transparent layers!

    Lost on the Internet? Go back to start.

  24. #24
    Don't worry, I don't exist Member King of Atlantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ruins of Atlantis a.k.a Florida
    Posts
    1,658

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    ah the return of the true abosakee!

  25. #25
    Member Member sunsmountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Of course CA didn't make any significant improvements to the AI, so what is their solution?
    Ah, it's STW/MTW-loving ToranagaSama talking. What are you doing here & posting on a Rome forum? Go play your beloved old total war game.

    I for one hope they DID make significant improvements to the AI, considering they've said so themselves here:

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...762#post868762

    So what have you to doubt them, Toranaga?

    in montem soli non loquitur

    (\_/) (>.<) That's what happens with bunnies
    (x.X)(_)(_) who want to achieve world domination!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  26. #26
    robotica erotica Member Colovion's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Victoria, Canada
    Posts
    2,295

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    Quote Originally Posted by sunsmountain
    Ah, it's STW/MTW-loving ToranagaSama talking. What are you doing here & posting on a Rome forum? Go play your beloved old total war game.

    I for one hope they DID make significant improvements to the AI, considering they've said so themselves here:

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...762#post868762

    So what have you to doubt them, Toranaga?

    The demo's reality purports that his statement is well founded.

    Of course myself and TS would love to have the AI improved, but playing the demo makes me somewhat perplexed with their statements thereof.

    ToranagaSama and myself are realists who wish for more; in the end our mentality evolves into a cynical and pessimistic state once it's been treated to past CA releases (RTW demo, Full, 1.2 patch especially here).
    robotica erotica

  27. #27
    Member Member Shaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    282

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    well, more provs wood have been nice, especially more than 2 provs for the whole of greece!

  28. #28
    Member Member M.T.Cicero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    The more the merrier - size medium, vanilla Central Europe style. What really annoys me with all rome maps is that in Greece for instance you have like 5 cities in an area that is 5 times smaller than a single province in Africa or in the East. Sure some areas are less populated but it makes no sense that in an area size of Italy there is a single rebel village with 500 people (Scythian/Sarmatian steppes look like that to me). Whole nations just kept coming from that area into Europe for years, it's not like they came from nowhere, they had to live somewhere before they moved. So it turns out size of the province does not so much depend on how populated it is but on how important it is for the story and how much trouble you need to gather some info on its history. That sux big time, IMO. I don't want map full of mini-provinces like in Greece where you have to siege every turn and I don't wanna march from Siwa to Lepcis Magna for 5 turns just to conquer another couple of hundred square kilometeres by killing some sorry bunch of peasants without even a palisade to hide behind. Why is that too much to ask??

  29. #29
    Cynic Senior Member sapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    I think 'broken' provinces would be a good idea.

    Have up to 4 cities per province, and once you take one of them the province is 'contested' and the ai will come at you and present the opportunity for a field battle. If you smash the opposing army, you could then go up to the remaining enemy cities which are devoid of a proper defense and have them surrender aka. Saladin vs. the crusaders
    From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
    We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer

  30. #30
    Member Member Shaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    282

    Default Re: Big provinces or small provinces? Your preference

    thats a good idea, but is impossible with the RTW engine.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO