View Poll Results: Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

Voters
24. This poll is closed
  • I have played only MTW multiplayer.

    0 0%
  • I have played only VI multiplayer.

    2 8.33%
  • I have played both but think MTW is best.

    0 0%
  • I have played both but think VI is best.

    16 66.67%
  • I have played both and think they are both equal.

    0 0%
  • I don’t play Medieval multiplayer.

    6 25.00%
Results 1 to 30 of 189

Thread: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    The problem with allowing upgrades is that ranged units and sword units pay less for their upgrades. That means those are the unit types that will get upgraded which reduces the effectiveness of cavalry on those unit types. The RPS system is undermined by the upgrades. For example, a cmaa with 1w1a equals a chiv knight in combat power, is a lot less expensive than the chiv knight and only slightly more expensive than an orderfoot spear.

    The cost system in MTW is messed up. Spears should be the least expensive unit, swords the middle priced unit and cavalry the most expensive unit. It's not like that in MTW because swords are the least expensive unit. For example, cmaa (250), orderfoot (400) and chiv knight (675).
    Last edited by Puzz3D; 07-25-2005 at 12:56.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO