View Poll Results: Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

Voters
24. This poll is closed
  • I have played only MTW multiplayer.

    0 0%
  • I have played only VI multiplayer.

    2 8.33%
  • I have played both but think MTW is best.

    0 0%
  • I have played both but think VI is best.

    16 66.67%
  • I have played both and think they are both equal.

    0 0%
  • I don’t play Medieval multiplayer.

    6 25.00%
Results 1 to 30 of 189

Thread: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Very Senior Member Gawain of Orkeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Centereach NY
    Posts
    13,763

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    Is the 7 max on cav really necessary or even useful? Some of the factions like Russian and Egyptian depend on cav because their melee infantry is relatively weak
    Otherwise you will have many peep using all cav. Besides by allowing v2 spears these armies inf isnt so weak any more. Ive been using Egypt with 4 v2 saracens. You can also take V1 abys and upgrade them.
    Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Tomisama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    To my thinking having valor 2 spears really eliminates the need for a cavalry max limit.

    Hey, you bring em, we’ll hoist em

    And I believe all of the other suggestions made here and on line, are either directly or indirectly self fulfilling regulatories (made up word).

    Also, considering v0 option, I see the 8k providing better control over excessive upgrades.

    The Viking era? It really has never made the interest chart for CWC contests, and I don’t think it should be included here either.


    At least to me, that leaves us with:

    v1 max - v2 max spear* - no art

    7k – 8k – 9k

    *All units with an anti cavalry rating (will make a list).

    Straight forward, simple, easily managed, and most important “sellable”!


    Are we there yet?

    HONOUR IS VICTORY - GO WITH HONOUR - KEEP THE CODE

    http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198003816474

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member Tomisama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    List of units with special anti cavalry ratings.

    1. Almughavars
    2. ArmouredSpearmen
    3. Billmen
    4. ChivalricFootKnights
    5. ChivalricSergeants
    6. FeudalSergeants
    7. GothicSergeants
    8. Halbardiers
    9. ItalianLightInfantry
    10. JanissaryHeavyInfantry
    11. MuwahidFoot
    12. NegroSpearmen
    13. OrderFootSoldiers
    14. Pikemen
    15. RoundShieldSpearmen
    16. RusSpearmen
    17. SaracenInfantry
    18. Spearmen
    19. SwissArmouredPikemen
    20. SwissHalbardiers
    21. SwissPikemen

    Please note: The Byzantine have none of the above in any era.

    A must have tool to help with army building decisions.
    http://www.clanwarscomp.org/tools/VIArmyBuilderPlus.zip
    Last edited by Tomisama; 07-28-2005 at 12:55. Reason: note:
    HONOUR IS VICTORY - GO WITH HONOUR - KEEP THE CODE

    http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198003816474

  4. #4

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    or you could classify spears according to whether they have a rank bonus, or possibly unit size - 99 and above - which would include byz inf.

  5. #5
    Very Senior Member Gawain of Orkeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Centereach NY
    Posts
    13,763

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    Thats the last thing we want is V2 byz inf on the field.
    Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way

  6. #6

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    Seems like the Byz faction will loose a bit of power, but they may still be pretty good. The varangian guard unit is good at v0, and they have pretty good cav such as Byz lancers. Byz inf will have low morale which will be a weakness, but you can get their combat power up with weapon or armor upgrades since they aren't too expensive.

    Low morale units can fight for a very long time because with most units limited to v1 max you don't get large mismatches in combat power. However, you do have to be more careful about protecting flanks, otherwise you will see quick routing. Also, 2 or more players ganging up on one are going to benefit more from the outnumbered morale penalty than they do in a higher florin game such as 10k and above. Attrition is going to be somewhat less important and position somewhat more important.
    Last edited by Puzz3D; 07-28-2005 at 17:31.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  7. #7
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: MTW or VI - Which Is Really The Best Medieval Multiplayer Game?

    The Byz are really a cav faction anyway. Its only because of the upgrades that some people are used to buying loads of infantry for that faction.


    CBR

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO