Poll: When should name suppression be lifted ?

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Name Suppression ... When should it be applied ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Lord of the House Flies Member Al Khalifah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Golden Caliphate
    Posts
    1,644

    Default Re: Name Suppression ... When should it be applied ?

    When found guilty. Often the slur of being named as a suspect in a serious crime is just as damaging to a person as actually being convicted. Naming someone before they are found guilty by a jury just leads to that person being found guilty and convicted by the media.
    Cowardice is to run from the fear;
    Bravery is not to never feel the fear.
    Bravery is to be terrified as hell;
    But to hold the line anyway.

  2. #2
    Member Member bmolsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Name Suppression ... When should it be applied ?

    Since trials should always be open to the public, I would have to say when charged.
    I think that the trials are important for the public. It's also the responsibility of the state to get a lost conviction published.
    Nobody should have to fear the legal process.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Name Suppression ... When should it be applied ?

    I agree with the general sentiment. Theres no reason to drag someone through the mud before they are found guilty.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO