And to my knowledge saddles didn't exist at this time so this is a fantasy unit.Originally Posted by King of Atlantis
And to my knowledge saddles didn't exist at this time so this is a fantasy unit.Originally Posted by King of Atlantis
Originally Posted by TB666
![]()
They had saddles at this time. They didn't have stirrups, perhaps that's what you're thinking of.
"Look I’ve got my old pledge card a bit battered and crumpled we said we’d provide more turches churches teachers and we have I can remember when people used to say the Japanese are better than us the Germans are better than us the French are better than us well it’s great to be able to say we’re better than them I think Mr Kennedy well we all congratulate on his baby and the Tories are you remembering what I’m remembering boom and bust negative equity remember Mr Howard I mean are you thinking what I’m thinking I’m remembering it’s all a bit wonky isn’t it?"
-Wise words from John Prescott
exactly.Originally Posted by Marcellus
No, according to what I know the first saddle didn't exist until 365(+-5 years) AD in Sarmatia.Originally Posted by Marcellus
Interesting. having searched around the internet for a while, I found several sites saying that the Sarmatians invented the saddle in AD365. However, I also found sites that showed that the Romans had saddles for their cavalry. It seems that the Sarmatians invented the saddle we know today, but that the Romans did have saddles before this. They just weren't as advanced as the saddles we have now. They had four 'horns' on them to stop the rider falling off:Originally Posted by TB666
![]()
"Look I’ve got my old pledge card a bit battered and crumpled we said we’d provide more turches churches teachers and we have I can remember when people used to say the Japanese are better than us the Germans are better than us the French are better than us well it’s great to be able to say we’re better than them I think Mr Kennedy well we all congratulate on his baby and the Tories are you remembering what I’m remembering boom and bust negative equity remember Mr Howard I mean are you thinking what I’m thinking I’m remembering it’s all a bit wonky isn’t it?"
-Wise words from John Prescott
Source please ??
Gotta remember that one of the reason that historians bash "the gladiator" is because they are using saddles.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Stage/3591/army.htmlOriginally Posted by TB666
http://www.caerleon.net/history/army/page7.html#saddleRoman cavalry of the early and middle Empire was organized in alae, units of 500 to 1,000 men divided into squadrons, or turmae, of 30 or 40 horsemen under the command of decurions. We know that the Romans used a kind of saddle, with four saddle horns for anchoring baggage, but they had no knowledge of stirrups, although they did use spurs
scroll down to the 'cavalry' bit
http://www.scran.ac.uk/packs/exhibit...s/56/Auxil.htm
http://www.legiiavg.org.uk/articles/..._wholedoc.htmlArchaeological discoveries, however, have revealed that the Roman saddle was designed with projecting horns to keep the rider firmly in place, rather like the cowboy saddle of more recent times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CavalryThe all-important saddle had no stirrups. These were replaced by the use of 4 horns on the saddle itself, which offered a great sense of security, as the horseman could not fall out.
p.s. it's 'Gladiator', not 'the Gladiator'. Maybe they were using the wrong kind of saddle?The decline of the Roman infrastructure made it successively more difficult to field large infantry forces, and during the second and third centuries cavalry began to take a more dominant role on the battlefield, also in part made possible by the appearance of new, larger breeds of horses. The replacement of the insubstantial Roman saddle by variants on the Scythian model, with pommel and cantle, was significant too.
"Look I’ve got my old pledge card a bit battered and crumpled we said we’d provide more turches churches teachers and we have I can remember when people used to say the Japanese are better than us the Germans are better than us the French are better than us well it’s great to be able to say we’re better than them I think Mr Kennedy well we all congratulate on his baby and the Tories are you remembering what I’m remembering boom and bust negative equity remember Mr Howard I mean are you thinking what I’m thinking I’m remembering it’s all a bit wonky isn’t it?"
-Wise words from John Prescott
I stand corrected then![]()
However the cavalry in the pic is still fantasy tho since it is the wrong saddle![]()
Bookmarks