No physical proof then.

As a believer in the metaphysical, you didn't factor in metaphysical origin. You, friend, are biased against Leprechauns

No physical proof again.

These arguments sound very familiar....
The whole concept of leprechans is not metaphysical. If you wanted claim there were metaphysical leprecahns then there is no way i could possibly prove it wrong or right.

Yes. Then, how do metaphysical beings make contact with physical beings like us?

Then god is physical and we should be able to see him. According to you we can't.
God is in everything, thus you do see him. Looking at a tree you are seing god, looking in the air you are seing god, but you want to see some mystic figure which isnt there.


I'd still say that expression is an artifact of man patterning god to himself .
When i imagine god i admit i see an old man with a great beard. That is a picture society has imprinted into my brain and it cant be helped, but that doesnt mean thats what i think God is. I believe God is in everything, being everywhere at once thus what his true image is is unimaginable to me.

Breathing is free will? Eating is free will? Do you have a choice in terms of breathing and eating among many other things?
No but i have a chioce in what i eat for dinner. God gives us that choice.

You just assume it is god, but evidence suggests it is not. Because Evolution is random. Now, if it is not random, I'd see an intention/design (from a higher being).
Lets assume evolution wasnt random, what would you see differnet. Scientific evidence doesnt go against god. Obviousl God created a universe were there is a system to everything. Laws that all things are bound to. Religion doesn't deny this.

I'll type randomly:

Evolution is random, how do you set that up?
If you believed that God was all powerful, the creator of everything, surely he could set it up.

Also, if god is real and omnipotent, I'd argue
- Spontaneous Creation not billions of years of random evolution.
Again God has made a universe of laws and systems, spontaneous creation wouldnt make sense.

- How many planets are there in our solar system? How many 'lifeforms'? Do each planets harbor the same condition as the other?
How many planets, some would argue this, but the standard number is 9. One of them has life at the moment, but Mars might have had life at some point.

I'd say nobody knows for sure. That's why assumption is an assumption. And god is a huge assumption.
I assume there is a creator to the creation
you assume there is none

We both make assumtions.

You seem so driven to find proof that God exist, but what kind of proof would you want to find and further more God why would God give you such evidence, then we would all be faithful, but we wouldn't have any faith.