Quote Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
I disagree, let me explain. The idealism of Nihilism was created by very complicated forms of writing. Just by reading Sartre and Nietzsche you can see that it's very difficult to comprehend what they are saying. The reason for this is that the ideas presented are very advanced and if not put into words properly come off as being defeatist and contradicotry. I think the article is flawed in the way it presents the ideas itself, but I give it enough credit as far as the facts are concerned.

There also comes a point where words can no longer desribe the truth, and one can only but comprehend himself through guidelines. Some things are taught, others require more personal thought behind them. I don't think it's right to dismis them that easily martyr.

i do not think that Sartre is a nihilist. Neitsche is, id guess, but i am not sure that anyone really buys it. Logically it is a solid enough concept but practically it is weak.