Don't Call Terrorists Names! It's insensitive!

[econ21]

I am not sure I believe the Johnelle Bryant story. From what I have read of Atta, I do not think he would walk into a US government office and threaten to cut a worker's throat. Do a google search on Johnelle Bryant and you'll find some scepticism. For example, her alleged meeting with Atta was before he was officially recorded as entering the country.

[PanzerJaeger]

So would you say Panzer, when it comes to terrorism, that you're so right that you're far-right?

Sorry... couldn't resist. Actually, you might say that mightn't you?

Definitely...

[Ja'chyra]

This kind of thing baffles me, another example is that our troops aren't allowed to use lasers e.g. target designators to blind the enemy but it's perfectly acceptable to shoot them in the head.

Call terrorists whatever you want, what does it matter to them, they'll be dead as soon as we catch them. Jaspan is an idiot, I wonder what he would have said if a captive had managed to get a knife and slit every one of the terrorists throats? Would he have hailed the guy as a hero and rightly justified as I would or would he have wanted him to sit peacefully and hope for release?

I would say that if anything we are not harsh enough on terrorists, if it was up to me I would kill everyone we could prove was a terrorist in such a way as they don't get their 70 virgins or whatever it is they think they're getting. If I could prove any mosque's or communities were advocating the use of suicide bombers I would take it apart and jail the instigators, like the guy on BBC 2 days ago who said he admired the London bombers and that suicide bombings can be justified.

[Al Khalifah]

They dont want to piss them off. Something like one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. Their supposed to report the news not make moral judgements LOL.

In that case the BBC shouldn't have called them attacks or bombings, rather than acts of liberation.