Quote Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Uh, gawain, you're being unecesarrily contrary now. There are no WMDs in Iraq, and there were none when we invaded. Clinging to that justification is just reactionary.
None - so explain the Sarin Gas Artillery shell that was used as an IED and failed to actually work correctly for several reasons- the first being that the sarin was over 10 years old - the second reason being that the two agents did not mix - because the shell is designed to mix the agents in flight.

Or can you explain the precruser that was found in serval locations, or how about the Duefer Report findings.

Was it in the amounts necessary to justify the President's and PM Blair's reasons for invading - well that is up to the individuals personal opinion.

However since the cease fire treaty and the UN resolutions stated that Iraq was to have No WMD - even the one round is by defination enough to techincially justify the invasion.