Romans

**antisocialmunky** · 08-03-2005, 23:04

Jumping to conclusions are we?

I was responding to Clayton's question and Colovion's reply. To expect every faction 'balanced' evenly in real life is not realistic so stop taking it the wrong way.

As we know, all empires are not created equally.

**Mongoose** · 08-03-2005, 23:06

What i am trying to say is that the game is very unbalanced, and not for historical reasons.

If anything, if would be much more realistic if the romans were less powerful....

Why are you so upset? It's not like their was any flaming in my post

**antisocialmunky** · 08-03-2005, 23:21

I don't like to be mobbed by people because they misunderstood or I wasn't clear in my post.

**Colovion** · 08-04-2005, 09:49

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

I don't like to be mobbed by people because they misunderstood or I wasn't clear in my post.

perhaps you should extrapolate

**marcus aquila** · 08-05-2005, 02:57

Hey Clayton,
If you would like more historical information on why the Romans were so strong, use Limewire to download files by a professor Garrett Fagan on Roman history- he explains in detail why they were so strong historically.
Enjoy playing this great game!

**King of Atlantis** · 08-05-2005, 04:05

The romans should be strong, but not as strong as they are in the game. The roman families usually take on greece,macedon,carthage, and gaul all at the same time, yet they manage to clobber them

Yes rome should win more times than not, but has anybody EVER seen the Ai wipe them out?