Three Kings = Very Poignant War in Iraq Movie

**Navaros** · 08-05-2005, 14:42

there is an old movie called Three Kings. it's about the first Gulf War. it's from 1999.

it's a very poignant movie. it portrays the USA as sort of good, and sort of evil. and same with Saddam's Iraqi army too. it shows some Iraqis who are supposed to be evil, and some who are sorta of good and have very legitimate reasons for hating the USA and hence understandably do bad things to US soldiers

it's the best war movie i've ever seen.

it has a lot of deep messages in it that show the USA in both a good light and a bad light at the exact same time

the acting is stellar all around. the script is top-notch. the visual style is very engrossing.

one of the most ironic things is that in the movie a solider is criticizing the USA to his CO for abandoning the Iraqis right after Bush Sr. told them to fight against Saddam, and then the CO replies with something like: "what do you want us to do, occupy Iraq and have another Vietnam on our hands?!" which of course is now what we have today, although the makers of the film did not know that at the time they were making it

have any of you seen Three Kings? if so, what are your thoughts and how do you think it is possible that an entire White House administration could be so stupid as to occupy Iraq when even Hollywood could see that occupying Iraq was a horrible idea. and they saw that way before 9/11

**Lazul** · 08-05-2005, 15:01

I agree... wait, hmm I agree with Navaros... odd... well anyway I agree its a very good movie! and like you said the script is superb!

**Es Arkajae** · 08-05-2005, 15:01

I thought it was a poor movie.

It couldn't seem to make up its mind whether it was a comedy, war movie, action or drama-war movie*.

The ending was also far from satisfying, I was led to believe it was going to be some kind of modern day 'Kelly's Heroes', instead I got a wishy washy film that wasn't funny enough to be a comedy and didn't have enough real battles and 'military stuff' to qualify it as a decent war film.

*Saving Private Ryan was a 'Drama-war movie', Battle of Britain and Tora, Tora, Tora were 'proper' war movies.

If that definition is still unclear then heres a good rule of thumb, if the movie involves copious amounts of "war is hell!" sentiment or lots of male crying then its likely a drama-war movie.

On the other hand if it contains copious amounts of pathetic prose, boring moralising and lots of male crying then its probably 'The Thin Red Line'

**Navaros** · 08-05-2005, 15:08

Originally Posted by Es Arkajae

I thought it was a poor movie.

It couldn't seem to make up its mind whether it was a comedy, war movie, action or drama-war movie*.

The ending was also far from satisfying

i love almost all the jokes in that movie. they are mostly very hilarious

and the best part is that the jokes in the movie are not done in a silly way which ruins the atmosphere in so many other movies

seems to me that it was a war movie with a lot of clever humor tactfully infused into the script

i loved the ending. it was great how the antagonist role played an ironic part in how things turned out in a somewhat good way. how can you not like a funny twist like that

**Lazul** · 08-05-2005, 15:09

Originally Posted by Es Arkajae

I thought it was a poor movie.

It couldn't seem to make up its mind whether it was a comedy, war movie, action or drama-war movie*.

The ending was also far from satisfying, I was led to believe it was going to be some kind of modern day 'Kelly's Heroes', instead I got a wishy washy film that wasn't funny enough to be a comedy and didn't have enough real battles and 'military stuff' to qualify it as a decent war film.

*Saving Private Ryan was a 'Drama-war movie', Battle of Britain and Tora, Tora, Tora were 'proper' war movies.

If that definition is still unclear then heres a good rule of thumb, if the movie involves copious amounts of "war is hell!" sentiment or lots of male crying then its likely a drama-war movie.

On the other hand if it contains copious amounts of pathetic prose, boring moralising and lots of male crying then its probably 'The Thin Red Line'

hmm so you cant handle emotions and realism then? War is perfect place to squeez in some philosofy and thinking like Thin Red Line.
People cry in war, or how would you react if your leg was blown of?

Go watch Rambo III or something.

**Es Arkajae** · 08-05-2005, 15:20

Originally Posted by Lazul

hmm so you cant handle emotions and realism then?

I was unaware you were dyslexic Lazul, I certainly don't recall mentioning anything against all emotions and realism.

War is perfect place to squeez in some philosofy and thinking like Thin Red Line.
People cry in war, or how would you react if your leg was blown of?

Oh and you also missed the word 'copious'?, you should probably see your optometrist.

Go watch Rambo III or something.

No I'll watch 'Battle of Britain', 'Tora, Tora, Tora', 'Guns of Navarone', 'Gettysburg', 'Zulu' etc.

You know war movies which are able to occasionally get across the horrors of war without dwelling on them and beating you over the head with an anti-war message. they also manage to remain entertaining, unlike SPR which after the initial beach landing becomes boring IMO

**PanzerJaeger** · 08-05-2005, 15:06

I wonder if we're thinking of the same movie.. with Ice Cube and Clooney?

I didnt think it was very good... the acting and plot were somewhat weak. Its been a long time since I saw it, but I wasnt impressed.

Its a typical hollywood setup, some bad dudes who are really good at heart have to choose between their own greed and the lives of innocents.. a la Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

I didnt see much deep in that movie either.. it seemed pretty topical. They just ran around from one bad situation to another, always narrowly missing danger, blah blah blah.

A good war movie in english is Saving Private Ryan.. thats got a lot of deepness, or if you can understand German, get Stalingrad or Das Boot - the subtitles dont do them justice at times. Those two titles are amazingly complex and deal with warfare in a completely different way.

Art is all opinion oriented, i just didnt like the movie that much.

**Navaros** · 08-05-2005, 15:20

Originally Posted by PanzerJager

I wonder if we're thinking of the same movie.. with Ice Cube and Clooney?

I didnt think it was very good... the acting and plot were somewhat weak. Its been a long time since I saw it, but I wasnt impressed.

I didnt see much deep in that movie either.. it seemed pretty topical. They just ran around from one bad situation to another, always narrowly missing danger, blah blah blah.

A good war movie in english is Saving Private Ryan.. thats got a lot of deepness, or if you can understand German, get Stalingrad or Das Boot - the subtitles dont do them justice at times. Those two titles are amazingly complex and deal with warfare in a completely different way.

narrowly escaping danger? dude there's very little of that in the movie. this movie has hardcore violence and torture in it. and a whole lotta gruesome deaths.

the violence is just not filmed in the same way as in Saving Private Ryan

i find Three Kings to be a much deeper movie than Ryan because in Ryan the dialogue itself didn't seem to have any relevance that goes beyond the immediate situation the soldiers are in. whereas Three Kings presents a highly relevant and easily understandable social commentary

like Tom Hanks, i too didn't care about the crybaby named Ryan. i did however, care alot about all the characters in Three Kings

**PanzerJaeger** · 08-05-2005, 15:36

Hmm, well Ill have to watch to movie again - its been a long time.

As to what Lazul and Es Arkajae were talking about: Anti-war is certainly a genre in film making and usually emphasizes the most horrible things about war, while neglecting a lot of history and such. This can be taken to extremes sometimes with so much crying and emotional pontification it becomes tiresome and unbelievable.

Just because someone doesnt like that kind of movie doesnt mean they are Rambo lovers.

**Sjakihata** · 08-05-2005, 16:00

What's wrong with Rambo?

**Lazul** · 08-05-2005, 16:37

Rambo 1 was ok, 2 was silly 3 was... stupid.

Rambo, his friend and some dudes on horses beat a Russian army... fat chance haha

**Kaiser of Arabia** · 08-05-2005, 19:55

It was ok, for a war movie though, I like Stalingrad.
I think Panzer may agree with me there.

**PanzerJaeger** · 08-05-2005, 20:02

Yea, a great movie that doesnt get much exposure over here.. just like Der Untergang. I had to go to a nasty little theater down town where they show foreign films to see it - but it was worth it.