An increase in frequency of one type of Flu over another is evolution.
Wouldn't that be natural selection?Originally Posted by Papewaio
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stewart Mills
But from the absolute will of an entire people there is no appeal, no redemption, no refuge but treason.
LORD ACTON
A lot of scientists have their doubts.Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stewart Mills
But from the absolute will of an entire people there is no appeal, no redemption, no refuge but treason.
LORD ACTON
You couldnt be more wrong. Both seek to explain results that seem too complex. Thats the whole point. You are again making my point calling a theory fact. All ID is basicly saying is God made evolution. Its like saying ford cars came from the ford factory and Henry ford had nothing to do with it.Originally Posted by Kanamori
One describes how things came to be, and the other seeks to explain results that seem too complex. The "how" can be tested in a scientific environment, whereas the philosophical "why" cannot be. That is why ID does not belong in a Science class.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
You can't test if there is or isn't a god or gods with science. So the why is best left to philosophy and religion classes. While the mechanics of theories and their testing left to science.
If it can be tested within the scientific framework, then teach it in a science class.
If it relies on something that is untestable then leave it to a religion class.
If it is a fuzzy area then make a new class like comparative belief systems.
Last edited by Papewaio; 08-10-2005 at 00:14.
Natural selection is a method of gene frequency change. Another is mutation of the gene itself.Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
All ID is basicly saying is God made evolution.
Gawain ; In that case teach it in religeous studies where it belongs .
Ok im all for classes on religous studies in school just like science. How about you? Great idea you have there.Gawain ; In that case teach it in religeous studies where it belongs .![]()
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Sure. Just as long as it covers Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judiasm, Christanity, Zorarastisim, Norse Mythology, Greek and Roman pantheons, it's all good.![]()
"But if you should fall you fall alone,
If you should stand then who's to guide you?
If I knew the way I would take you home."
Grateful Dead, "Ripple"
Why of course. I was taught all these things in school. Did you know that the founding fathers and our governent at one time made religous teaching is schools even universtities mandatory. That it was thought to be unconstitutional not to.Sure. Just as long as it covers Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judiasm, Christanity, Zorarastisim, Norse Mythology, Greek and Roman pantheons, it's all good.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Bookmarks