Thracians = Bulgarians + Romanians
It's a mix of it. Thracia was the south of Romania + the north of Bulgaria.
Thracians = Bulgarians + Romanians
It's a mix of it. Thracia was the south of Romania + the north of Bulgaria.
Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.
Proud![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Been to:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.
A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?
Errr Thracians = ancient peoples whom Dacians(Romanians) were related to
Bulgarians = people's who came from the steppes to Thracia(now bulgaria) in the 13th century
I think you have it mixed Edyz. Bulgarians are Turk and Slav mixed together.
That's six centuries off. The Bulgarians consider 681 the birthyear of their state.Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
I think Edyz is right. The Thracians are to Bulgaria and Roumania what Celts are to Britain in France. Some pockets of their language survive, their genes have been assimilated into the main ethnic populations that now populate their lands.
How is he right? This is what he said:
Here are some map to refute that.Originally Posted by edyz
A quote from teh encyclopedia:
So they came from Russia and invaded the area known as Thracia. They then got invaded by the Turks and mixed with them far more then any others. I don't think they are very Thracian, although I'm sure they have some thracian blood in them.Originally Posted by Encarta_Microsoft Corporation
Well there isn't much left of the Thracians... Their languages (they spoke several) seems lost, and their makeup seems lost as well. Most Thracian tribes are described quite different from how the people of the region look today.
So I dare say that the Thracians are gone. Of course their blood run in a few of us (not me I think), but so does many other peoples, and their governing traits and culture does not exist.
You may not care about war, but war cares about you!
The thracians were absorbed into the Slavic peoples that moved into what is now Bulgaria and Wallchia(SP). So were the Turkic Bulgars that conquered the Slavs in Bulgaria then became part of them. Both Thracians and the Bulgars left some cultural and linguistic remenants in the Bulgaria of today.
The Vlachs are the decendants of the Romans. Both of the very small Romano-Dacian population that was left behind after the legions left Dacia and Romans who migrated from Moesia superior and infirior (provinces located in what is now Serbia more or less) to the Transylvannian plateau after the Slavs moved into the Balkans in the 600's AD.
If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.
VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI
I came, I saw, I kicked ass
It should be pointed out that the first Principality of Wallachia was begun by a family descended from Cumans. Basarab, the ruler who established the principality has a Cuman name, as does his father Tihomir.
The area itself was first Thracian, but was a welcome mat for many incursions after Rome. First the Visigoths, then the Huns, then the Kutrigur Huns, then the Avars, then Bulgars from the south, then Slavs from the north, then Pechenegs, then Cumans, and finally the Mongols. After the Mongols left, the remaining Cumans established the above principality. Later they were conquered by the Ottomans. Attempting to draw a line from the Thracians to the Vlachs is impossible.
"Dee dee dee!" - Annoymous (the "differently challenged" and much funnier twin of Anonymous)
Bookmarks