Results 1 to 30 of 97

Thread: U.S.A.’s high hypocrisy hobbles nuclear stance (cut and pasted collumn)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: U.S.A.’s high hypocrisy hobbles nuclear stance (cut and pasted collumn)

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurin_Rules
    Actually, if its a simple case of might makes right, I can respect your stance. What I don't respect is this holier-than-thou attitude that cloaks the realpolitik in something very different, a high moral stance. If you just don't like the idea of brown Muslim people who live near Israel and control your oil having the bomb, then say so.
    No need to do that - there is an international treaty that states Iran would not use the technology to build weapons

    But don't pretend that your capable of using nukes 'responsibly' when you're the only one to use them against civilian targets--to use them at all, for that matter
    Do you really want to go in that direction - the historical evidence is out there about why the bomb had to be used in Truman's own words and futher backed up with the actions and words of the Japanese Military Council.

    --and are breaking international treaties,
    And what is Iran doing with the attempted building of nuclear weapons,

    fighting elective wars,
    An opinion

    invading other sovereign nations on false pretexts
    Not proven in any way shape or form - the best you have is that the reason stated for going to war were shown to be false - that means that the judgement was poor, the decision bad - not a false pretext.

    and breaking down the barriers between conventional and nuclear weapons at the same time. If it is just a case of might makes right, then at least have the balls to admit it.
    What barrier has the United States broken on the use of nuclear weapons? There is a certain treaty that the United States can be criticized for not ratifing in Congress, and then there is the building of new weapons to replace old weapons - an arguement that could be used to support your statement here.
    Last edited by Redleg; 08-15-2005 at 18:10.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO