While the memo may have been a fabrication and therefore Dan Rather had failed journalistically, what I have read/heard reported elsewhere it that the sentiment in the memo was an accurate representation of Dubya's commanders views of the situation. The memo might be false, but the story minus the memo is not.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
Really??? That's news. So who claimed the reward? Who has come out and proven that they served with the future president. The one fellow I know of claiming he remembered Dubya there didn't have service dates that lined up with Dubya. His claim was not credible.Wrong again. This is old and tired and has been debunked .
Seems like there would be a bunch of folks who would remember serving with a future president.
Bookmarks