Sounds like a good history lesson. One that the RTW fans in your class would love to follow, and actually be interested - for a change - in the subject you teach, namely history.
Now from what I read in CA's comments, they are not stating these things as fact. Because of my general knowledge, I know 120 men of Head Slingers are fantasy (you can actually prove this using logistics/chemistry reasoning), and considering the source (see your previous post), this affects the credibility of ALL their OTHER work (by deduction).
This contradicts your statement about assertation on the part of CA. How can CA state horse artillery as fact when they are then also stating Head Slingers as fact? Or do we need a list to separate trustworthy statements from untrustworthy statements? From the same company/source??
Perhaps you are unaccustomed to having your historical source (the interpreter at CA) alive instead of dead, and this may cause confusion in your scientific mind. Rest assured, though, that CA does not intend to disrupt your classroom. I would be worried more about commercials, and their effect on creating fact out of fiction.
Bookmarks