Results 1 to 30 of 238

Thread: Duh! "Intelligent Falling"!!!

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #21
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: Duh! "Intelligent Falling"!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Quietus
    But how do you know it was a satire aside from it coming the Onion site?
    Lets see a made up Religous Institution, using a dead Rev. as the individual advancing the theory, and the mis-quotes of several key bible passages. That and I read the Onion occassionally and know what they do.

    What's the different of the Intelligent Falling theory satire from Intelligent Design theory in a contextual sense?
    See above - I can not answer your question because I know that the Onion Article is a satire to poke fun at the "Intelligent Design" theory and to futher poke fun at those who want to find fault with Religion. They poke fun at all sides of an issue - that is what makes the Onion so great.

    There is no bias. Both are scientifically unfounded and unsupported. There's no difference between Intelligent Design and Intelligent Falling theory contextually, aside from the latter originating from a satire site.
    That is your opinion - you are completely entitled to have it - however again I understand that the Intelligent Design Theory is based upon Religious belief. I am not advocating teaching it to you or to students in school - because like I said - I know its a religious based thought.

    However you have now answered the question - you based your initial assumption of D'oh! There's no gravity according to the Evangelical Center for Faith-based Reasoning. It's all about God pushing objects 'down' called the Intelligent Falling Theory. as being a real theory spouted by religion because you want to find fault with religion.

    Face it Quietus you bought the article hook, line, and sinker.

    I was asking you the same question, what's the difference, contextually, between the two.
    And its been answered to the best of my ability - you want to convince me that Intelligent Design theory is a Religious based theory not based on science - which I have stated that I know its based upon religion. So your arguing in circles - I have already stated what you want to hear. Intelligent Design is a religious based theory of evolution based upon religious belief.

    Aside from saying ID is a Christian theory and the other is a Satiric, you can't say what's the difference in context between the two.
    It seems you are missing the my point - I also recoginzed it as false because the bible is mis-quoted. THe context of the religious teachings of the theory are completly wrong - therefore the theory is a false one even by religious standards that I know. It seems however you don't want to hear reason based upon a religious viewpoint - you want to find fault with anything to do with religion.

    Okay since you seem to be against Religious thought, and soley for Scientific based thought. Answer this simple question.

    What caused the Big Bang?

    [sarcasm on]

    Because according to what you seem to have written here - you would have to find fault with the Big Bang Theory also.

    Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions.
    The scientists don't even know when it happen all they have is a best guess.

    http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy...se/b_bang.html

    [sarcasm off]
    Last edited by Redleg; 08-19-2005 at 06:23.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO