Quote Originally Posted by Al Khalifah
Queitus, you must have very poor vision, since you seem completely incapable of percieving shades of grey. You have a very black and white picture of Christianity. You seem to believe that all Christians subscribe to a totally devoted evangelical model of the Universe and are fully behind creationism. This just isn't the case. I'm a Christian, I don't believe in 6 day creationism and I don't believe God is behind evolution (directly). What I and many other Christians believe is that God cause the Big Bang - thus creating the Universe. Why do you find that hard to comprehend? It's no more or less plausible than the scientific 'well it just kinda happened for no reason' argument. What happened from then on, happened.

I know some Christians may believe everything in the Bible literally and I fully respect that, but you can't just apply this blanket principle over the entire faith of more than 1.5 billion people - not to mention the billions more who believe in other religions that teach a similar beginning. By your thinking, because the Klu Klux Klan are Christian, therefore all Christians are white supremacists.

I've noticed that a lot of hostility and anti-Christian sentiment on this forum seems be against the 'extreme American version' of Christianity. Please bear in mind when you are rolling out your generalisations that there is Christianity outside of the CSA and it is not necessairly the same.
Al Khalifah,

Let me explain. Here's my point when I posited this to Redleg:
Quote Originally Posted by Quietus
Intelligent Design: God is "behind evolution" (in your own words).
Intelligent Falling: God is behind gravity. (Onion article).

What is the difference?
Both Intelligent Design and Intelligent Falling aren't science, true. But what I'm saying is that if anyone were to reject the principle context and concept of Intelligent Falling, then that someone must rebuff Intelligent Design likewise because they are the same!

If anyone disagrees with this, then what's the difference? (I've asked this so many times....)

Vice versa, if you were to embrace Intelligent Design then you can't call Intelligent Falling a "stupidity".

Myself, I strongly disagree with both, because they are the same bunk idea. One is applied to Evolution, the other to Gravity.