Results 1 to 30 of 114

Thread: Was WW2 in Europe Justified?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member bmolsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Was WW2 in Europe Justified?

    A point on the Chemical weapons usage. Wasn't the main reason for not using chemical weapons that they where unpredictable and not very efficient against military units ??

  2. #2
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Was WW2 in Europe Justified?

    Quote Originally Posted by bmolsson
    A point on the Chemical weapons usage. Wasn't the main reason for not using chemical weapons that they where unpredictable and not very efficient against military units ??
    Not from what I've read. It was primarily feared that the same weapons would be employed against the attacker. Apparently, German documents suggest that they didn't use their new discoveries for that reason. Chemical weapons were viewed with widespread disgust after WWI and the Geneva Protocol was signed by 16 nations to prohibit their use.

    If the military command can prevent introduction of a weapon that will terrify their own men (assuming the enemy has the same) then they are likely to do so. It adds a layer of complexity to warfare to use chemical weapons, and it also makes it more difficult for the attacker to occupy the ground after the attack. I suspect it was "convenient" for everyone not to use chemical weapons as it has negative consequences on one's own forces as well.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO