Pure Peace Possible ?

[LeftEyeNine]

" One day people will live in peace and prosperity, without any battles and fights. No racial, no religious, no sexual discrimination will take place. We will all live in peace.. "

Do you think humanity will ever be able to maintain a high-elf-like peaceful order ?

Whoever rowing towards such a purpose must be high (never an elf, though), or at least should be warned that it is impossible with the human nature existing as soon as possible - before losing the boat - I think.

"Bad" stands to show the value of the "Good". So that there always will be a "conflict - solution", "decay - heal", "fight - ceasefire" process, I think..

Any comments ? Or suggestions for a high elf life ?

[derF]

I think its possible, yes. Through globalisation.

[Ianofsmeg16]

"To secure peace is to prepare for war" Don't Tread on me -Metallica
i'm sure somebody said it before but what the hay...
i dont think there can be pure peace. ountries are like children, sometimes the get along peacefully but other times they fight, we will never resolve that, some countries are just to different to get along

[LeftEyeNine]

Globalisation removes the country borders in theory, not the racial genetics, religious beliefs or sexual creation and preferences, does it ?

[Kagemusha]

Peace will fallow when every last of us humans are dead.

[Duke Malcolm]

I don't think that pure peace is possible. It is against human nature.

[LeftEyeNine]

Peace will fallow when every last of us humans are dead.

Maybe I have to understand my first post as if it was another member's post. It is pure peace because the high elves have it, not humans..

[Kagemusha]

Good thinking there LeftEyeNine.

[derF]

Globalisation removes the country borders in theory, not the racial genetics, religious beliefs or sexual creation and preferences, does it ?

Eventually, it will. :)

[JimBob]

Globalization does remove racial and cultural borders. When a Jew and a Christian marry (happen more often now) the border between the two shrinks, when an Arab immigrant marrys a Germanic person who's lived in the US all their life and is 7th generation borders are removed.

But even without globalization there can be peace. It won't happen while any of us are alive but it will eventually.

[LeftEyeNine]

Don't tell me that they mean "mutation" by saying "liberation" ! OH MY GOD !

[Strike For The South]

Peace? No. And what a boring world that would be anyway. One man's perfect is another man's terrible. It will always be a struggle between ideals, whether embodied in racism, war, or politics.

[Azi Tohak]

No. I do not believe the world will ever be totally peaceful.

Azi

[Xiahou]

I don't think that pure peace is possible. It is against human nature.

It's not just "human" nature. It's against all nature.

[LeftEyeNine]

It's not just "human" nature. It's against all nature.

I've never seen a tree swinging furiously his branches towards another one. I did not see any lions killing some gazelle for fun either..

The devastation always occurs within nature while replacing it. But human nature devastates without healing or replacing it..

[Xiahou]

War isn't for fun either you realize. It's just a more advanced form of what happens in nature. A lion kills for food. Wolves fight and kill each other for control of territory... and so on. We do the same things in a more advanced fashion- fight for control of territory and resources.

[Silver Rusher]

What do Total War players care about peace?

[LeftEyeNine]

Xiahou

Your claim means that every battle has its universally rightful act ?

A lion kills for food. If one gazelle is enough, one gazelle is killed. He does not send his sons to sneak in other lions' areas to see how many gazelles live there or invades another reign to liberate the gazelles. They aim directly and in a plain manner.. Human nature does not stop with "basic satisfaction".

[LeftEyeNine]

What do Total War players care about peace?

Don't tell me that Sims players are all super-social types..

[Xiahou]

A lion kills for food- so do we. Also, lions, wolves, even simple jellyfish kill each other for control of territory and resources. You don't even have to consider predation. A lion will kill another because it has come onto his pride's territory or it may be killed itself by another lion who wants control of his territory and mates. The victor will the proceed to kill all of the young who are not it's own decendants. Wolf packs can completely wipe out rival packs in bids to take over their territory.

Even simple Anemones that float on the tides exist in a constant state of 'warfare' with colonies attacking and killing each other with every tide.

[Kongamato]

I don't think it is possible, as I think it would involve solving the scarcity problem. Scarcity is a root of many other problems, and human developments don't seem to be able to stop it.

[LeftEyeNine]

Xiahou,

Yes, all you say are true. And you simply point "survival of the fittest" rule. The mankind has many complex rules - usually much more than control of your territory and basic organic needs.

[BDC]

Yes, when there is some extra-terrestrial/super-natural presence that means anyone who even tries to start a war is immediately blown up or whatever.

We just need some teachers to control the moody bullies in the playground.

[Xiahou]

Xiahou,

Yes, all you say are true. And you simply point "survival of the fittest" rule. The mankind has many complex rules - usually much more than control of your territory and basic organic needs.

Of course, everything about human society is more complex, by definition than the animal kingdom. If you're going to beg the question and define warfare as something only human, then of course war would end with the end of humanity. However, intraspecies conflict over territory and resources is not uniquely human and would continue regardless of our existence.

[Del Arroyo]

Peace is impossible, for one simple reason-- if everyone in the world lays down their arms, all it would take is a small group of agressive individuals to use this to their advantage and wreck everything.

Another clear indication of the impossibility of pure peace is that it has NEVER, in the ENTIRE existence of mankind, EVER occurred. Nor can it be found ANYWHERE in the animal kingdom.

To believe in the possibility of pure peace is pure delusion.

DA

[Del Arroyo]

And personally, I wouldn't want such a peace. The blind belief in such a peace is one of the most potentially dangerous delusions that anyone could have. He who would promise such a piece would really only be be offering a stifling tyranny.

DA

[Divinus Arma]

There will never be pure peace because of religion.

You can thank Christianity and Islam.


Maybe in the very very distant future...

[sharrukin]

There will never be pure peace because of religion.

You can thank Christianity and Islam.


Maybe in the very very distant future...

Yeah, Stalin was such a peaceful man.

We need more men like him!

[Byzantine Prince]

I think we first need to define "pure" peace or else this is just going to be one of those lame threads that go nowhere.

Let me be the first to say, not such thing as peace exists anyways. There is conflict within everyone of us and there is conflict within all the different groups and sub-groups of society.

Once again though, feel free to ignore me and go on with your tirades.

[bmolsson]

Peace is possible. We just need to learn alternative methods of conflict resolution.