Quote Originally Posted by Soulforged
1- Even if you try to teach the jury the science of law 5 h a day, it's too little time to understand (even more in complicated cases), and too much time wasted. The judgements by this standard can be delayed only by that. I've even heard that in USA the judgements can be delayed to the point of prescription just selecting the jury!!. I'll have to study for 6 years only to graduate myself, and more if i want specialization. But in reality study never ends, if you really want to practice law properly you've to keep yourself informed on pages and pages of doctrine and jurisprudence, besides of course of sociology, phylosophy, history and all the other auxialiary sciences of the law.
If the law is too archaic for your average juror to be able to comprehend, then I don't think it's the jurors that are the problem.

Quote Originally Posted by A.Saturnus
Isn´t "become removed" a synonym for being impartial?
No.